2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2009.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented fuzzy cognitive maps for modelling LMS critical success factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferreira, Jalali, J. Ferreira, Stankevičienė, & Marques, 2016b). The cause-and-effect relationships between the concepts can then take on three different forms, depending on the type of influence one concept exerts on the other: (1) positive causality, when an increase in the value of one concept leads to an increase in the value of another concept; (2) negative causality, when an increase in the value of one concept leads to a decrease in the value of another concept; and (3) lack of causality, when two concepts do not influence each other (Salmeron, 2009). Figure 1 exemplifies an FCM.…”
Section: Cognitive Maps and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferreira, Jalali, J. Ferreira, Stankevičienė, & Marques, 2016b). The cause-and-effect relationships between the concepts can then take on three different forms, depending on the type of influence one concept exerts on the other: (1) positive causality, when an increase in the value of one concept leads to an increase in the value of another concept; (2) negative causality, when an increase in the value of one concept leads to a decrease in the value of another concept; and (3) lack of causality, when two concepts do not influence each other (Salmeron, 2009). Figure 1 exemplifies an FCM.…”
Section: Cognitive Maps and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carlucci et al 2013). This type of cognitive mapping has since been applied in a wide range of different decision situations (an extensive deliberation falls outside of the scope of this paper; but for further discussion, see Tsadiras et al 2003;Kok 2009;Salmeron 2009;Yaman and Polat 2009;Papageorgiou et al 2012;Salmeron 2012).…”
Section: Background On Fuzzy Cognitive Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other reported methods, like [115] and [116] have extended classical ones, in order to accommodate for the credibility factors of individual maps, by replacing the ordinary average with a weighted average. The weights w i are assigned to experts proportionally to their reliability and take values from range [0,1].…”
Section: Co-published By Atlantis Press and Taylor And Francis Copyrighmentioning
confidence: 99%