Augmented conductivity in Li3xLa2/3−xTiO3 nanoparticles: all-solid-state Li-ion battery applications

Sulfide and Oxide Inorganic Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li Batteries: A Review

“…However, for academic purposes, the study conducted by Araki et al [476] on the fundamental physical properties of Li 3x La 1/3−x MO 3 (M = Ta, Nb) revealed that the thermal expansion coefficient was~3 × 10 −6 K −1 above 400 K regardless of x. More studies were conducted to analyze modified synthesis methods, understand the interface mechanisms, and improve the conductivity using modified strategies [276,[477][478][479][480][481][482][483][484][485][486][487][488][489][490][491] such as combining 10-15 wt.% LLTO electrolyte with polymer electrolytes/ionic liquid [492] or commercial 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 in mixture of ethylene carbonate+dimethyl carbonate+diethyl carbonate (EC:DMC:DEC) electrolytes with LLTO, and in some cases using polymer separators. These batteries are typically termed "hybrid composite SSBs", and the reduction of Ti in the LLTO electrolyte cannot be suppressed in these cells.…”

π-d conjugation regulates the cathode/electrolyte interface in all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries

“…The spectrum of LLTO was concentrated between 100–600 cm −1 ; however, this response was not well preserved in DHBQ-LLTO due to the interaction of DHBQ with LLTO, which modifies the vibrational modes of these materials. 43 Furthermore, DHBQ and ball-milled DHBQ-LLTO materials show a distinctive D peak at ∼1300 cm −1 and G peak at ∼1600 cm −1 , with an I D / I G ratio of 0.698 for DHBQ and 1.788 for DHBQ-LLTO, indicating the transformation of the defective carbon into graphitized carbon. These findings confirm the existence of a chemical bond between DHBQ-LLTO with notable compatibility, rather than just the formation of a physical mixture of DHBQ and LLTO.…”

Growth and High-Performance Photodetectors of CsPbBr3Single Crystals

“…The FWHM of the (110) plane of the treatment crystal is 0.082° (Figure b), narrower than that of the control crystal by 0.011°. Also, it is shifted to a higher angle by 0.022°, which usually means a better crystallinity . For an accurate analysis of the FWHM of the XRD, we fitted the diffraction peaks generated on the surface of (110).…”

“…Also, it is shifted to a higher angle by 0.022°, which usually means a better crystallinity. 36 For an accurate analysis of the FWHM of the XRD, we fitted the diffraction peaks generated on the surface of (110). Using the Gaussian fitting model, the corresponding equations and parameters are given in eq 1 and Table S6 .…”