1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0171-2985(86)80090-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmentation of Antibody Responses of Mice to Inhaled Protein Antigens by Simultaneously Inhaled Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with tracheostomy or direct tracheal puncture (Su et al 2004), this method is faster, less invasive, not mutilating and probably less painful for the animal, thus representing an example of 'refined' airway management. As also recently shown with a radioactive tracer (Su et al 2004), the certainty of dosage and substance application is higher than in most alternatives, including: direct 'blind' transoral intratracheal injection (Vernooy et al 2001); or external surgical tracheal preparation and injection (Kujime & Natelson 1981) or non-surgical injection (Su et al 2004); intranasal application (Szarka et al 1997, Su et al 2004; aerosol chamber exposition (Mizoguchi et al 1986), otoscopic (DeLeonardis et al 1995, Hastings & Summers-Torres 1999, direct (Spoelstra et al 2007) or fibreoptic laryngoscopic (Costa et al 1986), or arthroscopic transoral tracheal application (Vergari et al 2003). The intraoral substance application is also used (Vlad et al 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When compared with tracheostomy or direct tracheal puncture (Su et al 2004), this method is faster, less invasive, not mutilating and probably less painful for the animal, thus representing an example of 'refined' airway management. As also recently shown with a radioactive tracer (Su et al 2004), the certainty of dosage and substance application is higher than in most alternatives, including: direct 'blind' transoral intratracheal injection (Vernooy et al 2001); or external surgical tracheal preparation and injection (Kujime & Natelson 1981) or non-surgical injection (Su et al 2004); intranasal application (Szarka et al 1997, Su et al 2004; aerosol chamber exposition (Mizoguchi et al 1986), otoscopic (DeLeonardis et al 1995, Hastings & Summers-Torres 1999, direct (Spoelstra et al 2007) or fibreoptic laryngoscopic (Costa et al 1986), or arthroscopic transoral tracheal application (Vergari et al 2003). The intraoral substance application is also used (Vlad et al 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…LPS is a major stimulant of the innate immune system through interactions with TLR-4, and it often exhibits potent adjuvant properties (29,34). Previously established immunological mechanisms involved with adjuvant function of LPS include the production of proinflammatory or immunoregulatory cytokines (7), the stimulation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to upregulate the expression of costimulatory molecules (6), and the control of dendritic cell migration (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2004 could also enhance the uptake and presentation of heterologous vaccine antigens to mucosal immune cells. Simultaneously, or in concert with the Ipa protein activity, the LPS component of Invaplex, a previously identified immunostimulator (29), may be capable of binding Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) and stimulating cells of the innate immune system to release proinflammatory cytokines, which in turn influence adaptive immune responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because LPS has been shown to act as an adjuvant for allergic contact sensitivity to haptens 40 and to be an adjuvant for immunoglobulin E responses when inhaled with antigen. [41][42][43][44] In addition, LPS acts synergistically with allergen resulting in a magnification of specific allergen-induced mediator release. [45][46][47] Thus, problems of LPS contamination on natural latex products are not only pyrogenicity, but may also be associated with other adverse reactions, such as tissue irritation and induction or enhancement of latex allergy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%