Auditory Status and Experiences of Abuse Among College Students

Porter, Judy L.; Williams, LaVerne McQuiller

doi:10.1891/0886-6708.26.6.788

Cited by 28 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If we use the results from the model with all cases and no interaction effect from Table 3(a) and Table 4(a), we see that students that were Deaf or hard of hearing were 3 times more likely to report both psychological and physical abuse than hearing students. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have found that Deaf and hard of hearing students are significantly more likely to report abuse than their hearing peers (Anderson & Leigh, 2010;Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011a;Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011b), and highlight the importance for education among groups about their varying risks for different types of abuse. Students who are Deaf or hard of hearing, for example, may be exposed to "disability-specific forms of violence" by partners, such as destruction of communication devices (Powers et al, 2009(Powers et al, : p. 1041 (Anderson et al, 2011: p. 204).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Even though Deaf and hard of hearing women were more likely to report psychological abuse, it was not nearly as strong an effect as that for Deaf and hard of hearing men. Consistent with previous research (Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011b), this suggests that disability has a different impact on victimization rates for men and women. Disability theory seems to be supported for men, but not for women.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…For example, psychological abuse may include the perpetrator insulting the victim by calling the victim "hearing" or making fun of his/her sign language skills, signing very close to the victim's face (Anderson, 2014), or tying the victim's hands to prevent the victim from signing (Packota, 2000). Recent studies have demonstrated that IPV among the Deaf and hard of hearing community is an important issue (Anderson, 2010;Anderson, Leigh, & Samar, 2011;Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011a, 2011b) that warrants further study. Disability theory would predict that persons with disabilities would be at a higher risk of physical or psychological abuse than those who did not have a disability.…”

Section: Disability Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, recent studies using college samples in the U.S. indicate that prevalence rates of experiencing intimate partner violence were more than doubled for Deaf and hard of hearing individuals when compared to hearing populations (Anderson, 2010;Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011a;Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011b). For example, in a recent study conducted by Anderson and Leigh (2010), a significantly higher proportion of Deaf women undergraduates at a college in Washington, D.C. reported IPV victimization (i.e., physical assault and psychological aggression) than hearing students in the previous year.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, in a recent study conducted by Anderson and Leigh (2010), a significantly higher proportion of Deaf women undergraduates at a college in Washington, D.C. reported IPV victimization (i.e., physical assault and psychological aggression) than hearing students in the previous year. Similarly, using randomized samples of over 1000 college men and women, including over 200 Deaf and hearing students at a large U.S. northeastern university, it was found that Deaf and hard of hearing college students were twice as likely to report psychological abuse and nearly two and a half times more likely to experience physical abuse at the hands of a partner than hearing students in the prior year (Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011a;Porter & McQuiller Williams, 2011b). Studies of IPV among Deaf or hard of hearing college students at Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C. found psychological abuse to be more prevalent (30%) than physical abuse (11%) in their current relationships among 1 In the United States, Deaf people do not see themselves as having a disability, but rather have a culture and way of communication that is denied by the dominate hearing culture (Sadusky & Obinna, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Intimate Partner Violence in a U.S. College Sample: Do Auditory Status and Gender Predict Victimization?

Beaulieu¹,

Williams²,

Porter³

2017

PSYCH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our research examines the effect of auditory status and gender on self-reported psychological and physical abuse of college students from a northeastern university in the United States. A total of 816 college students were surveyed. Forty classes were randomly selected and surveys were administered to students in those classes. Predictions from disability theory, feminist theory, and feminist disability theory were tested using binary logistic regression analysis. Gender specific binary logistic regressions were run to examine the possibility that predictors of abuse differ by gender. Disability theory predicted that Deaf and hard of hearing students were at a higher risk for reporting victimization. The results from the analyses support disability theory and show that Deaf and hard of hearing students were more likely to report victimization. Feminist theory predicted that women would be more likely to be abused than men. Feminist theory received mixed support. Women regardless of auditory status were more likely to report psychological abuse, but were not more likely to report physical abuse. Feminist disability theory hypothesized that the risk of abuse would be higher for Deaf and hard of hearing women than for either hearing women and men, and Deaf and hard of hearing men. Feminist disability theory was tested by including an interaction effect (auditory status by gender). Feminist disability theory received no support. The interaction effect between auditory status and gender was negative, indicating that Deaf and hard of hearing women college students were less likely to report victimization than one would expect when the interaction effect is not included in the model.

show abstract