1968
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90020-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory specificity in unit recordings from cat's visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These recent results were highly complementary to the pioneer works of Schroeder's laboratory that have revealed the multimodal feature of the monkey auditory belt where both visual and somatosensory responses can be evoked (Schroeder et al, 2001;Schroeder and Foxe, 2002;Fu et al, 2003). In the carnivore, while previous studies have reported that the visual cortex can be activated by auditory stimuli (Spinelli et al, 1968;Morrell, 1972;Fishman and Michael, 1973), intracellular recording in the primary visual cortex (A17) have recently failed to find such auditory responses (Sanchez-Vives et al, 2006). Consequently, because no evidence of auditory or visuo-auditory activity was reported at the single cell level in the awake monkey and to investigate the role of the A1 to V1 projection described in the macaque, we performed an electrophysiological study of the effect of an auditory stimulus on the neuronal activity of area V1 in a behaving monkey performing an oculomotor task (Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Electrophysiological Evidence In the Primary Sensory Areassupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These recent results were highly complementary to the pioneer works of Schroeder's laboratory that have revealed the multimodal feature of the monkey auditory belt where both visual and somatosensory responses can be evoked (Schroeder et al, 2001;Schroeder and Foxe, 2002;Fu et al, 2003). In the carnivore, while previous studies have reported that the visual cortex can be activated by auditory stimuli (Spinelli et al, 1968;Morrell, 1972;Fishman and Michael, 1973), intracellular recording in the primary visual cortex (A17) have recently failed to find such auditory responses (Sanchez-Vives et al, 2006). Consequently, because no evidence of auditory or visuo-auditory activity was reported at the single cell level in the awake monkey and to investigate the role of the A1 to V1 projection described in the macaque, we performed an electrophysiological study of the effect of an auditory stimulus on the neuronal activity of area V1 in a behaving monkey performing an oculomotor task (Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Electrophysiological Evidence In the Primary Sensory Areassupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Because source estimations were performed after first Raij et al, 2010), suggesting that pathways for convergence may be the same as those generating interaction effects (although this remains to be more thoroughly examined; reviewed in Meredith et al, 2009 andvan Atteveldt et al, 2014a). In agreement with this notion are data from animals demonstrating auditory as well as somatosensory cross-modal convergence within visual cortex of monkeys Wang et al, 2008), cats (Murata et al, 1965;Spinelli et al, 1968;Morrell, 1972;Majkowski and Sobieszek, 1972;Fishman and Michael, 1973), and mice (Iurilli et al, 2012). For example, Iurilli et al (2012) showed that auditory inputs suppressed visual responses within infragranular layers of primary visual cortex via GABAergic synapses and moreover that this suppression was directly linked to performance (as measured by a conditioned motor response).…”
Section: Electromagnetic Signals (Eeg/meg)supporting
confidence: 64%
“…This phenomenon is often described as ''early sensory integration'', as it proposes that cross-modal effects occur early in time during the response and in areas that are generally regarded as lower (early) in the sensory hierarchy (Schroeder et al 2004;Foxe and Schroeder 2005;Ghazanfar and Schroeder 2006). It is worth noting that already several decades ago some studies suggested crossmodal interactions in lower sensory areas, but they perished in the mass of studies suggesting otherwise (Lomo and Mollica 1959;Murata et al 1965;Bental et al 1968;Spinelli et al 1968;Morrell 1972;Fishman and Michael 1973;Vaudano et al 1991).…”
Section: Functional Criteria For Sensory Integrationmentioning
confidence: 94%