2019
DOI: 10.1017/s003329171800380x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory hallucinations, top-down processing and language perception: a general population study

Abstract: BackgroundStudies investigating the underlying mechanisms of hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia suggest that an imbalance in top-down expectations v. bottom-up processing underlies these errors in perception. This study evaluates this hypothesis by testing if individuals drawn from the general population who have had auditory hallucinations (AH) have more misperceptions in auditory language perception than those who have never hallucinated.MethodsWe used an online survey to determine the presence of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants completed assessments of HEs, as well as source memory, dichotic listening, verbal working memory, and auditory signal detection tasks, and an assessment of adverse childhood events. Given recent focus on the prevalence and quality of online data collection (de Boer et al, 2019;Peer et al, 2017), we also sought to investigate the quality of data gained through online collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants completed assessments of HEs, as well as source memory, dichotic listening, verbal working memory, and auditory signal detection tasks, and an assessment of adverse childhood events. Given recent focus on the prevalence and quality of online data collection (de Boer et al, 2019;Peer et al, 2017), we also sought to investigate the quality of data gained through online collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These percentages should hence be interpreted with caution [for an elaboration on this point, see Refs. (9, 11)]. Furthermore, similar to the Khandaker et al’s (8) study, we based the presence of atopic disorders on these self-reported data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Participants filled out demographic data (e.g., age, sex, handedness, highest level of education), followed by the QPE hallucination items. After two recognition tasks [results described by De Boer (11)], participants could progress to the QPE items on delusions and the questions evaluating atopic disorders (6,857 valid entries). The current sample was restricted by age (≥14 years), resulting in 6,479 participants with complete data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the QPE screening questionnaire has already been used as a self-report questionnaire (Begemann, Linszen, de Boer et al, 2019) to group participants in terms of presence/frequency of PLEs (de Boer, Linszen, de Vries et al, 2019), only the full QPE interview has been validated in a patient population so far (Rossell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, Sommer and colleagues (2018) provided a short QPE screening questionnaire that only asks about the presence of hallucinatory and delusional experiences. However, although the QPE screening questionnaire has already been used as a self‐report questionnaire (Begemann, Linszen, de Boer et al ., 2019) to group participants in terms of presence/frequency of PLEs (de Boer, Linszen, de Vries et a l ., 2019), only the full QPE interview has been validated in a patient population so far (Rossell et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%