“…Research on modality of presentation (Taub, 1975(Taub, , 1976Taub & Kline, 1976, 1978, which represents the only systematic attempt in the literature to evaluate age-related performance with meaningful connected prose, indicated that findings with sequentially presented stimuli could not be generalized to more realistic non-laboratorytype situations. Previous studies with various types of unequated stimuli (pictures, words) or equated sequential stimuli (digits) had suggested that aged individuals may have more difficulty in processing materials that are presented visually than they do when an auditory mode is used (Arenberg, 1968;Boyle, Aparicio, Kaye & Acker, 1975;Bromley, 1958;Farrimond, 1968;McGhie, Chapman & Lawson, 1965;Taub, 1972). On the other hand, studies with simultaneous presentation and prose materials indicated no differences in modalities when presentation is controlled and a better visual than auditory mode when there is opportunity for review.…”