2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auction procedures and competition in public services: The case of urban public transport in France and London

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
43
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The UK auctions (in London) were small and highly transparent, while the French auctions were bigger and less transparent [10]. Operating costs ended up being a lot lower in London, although costs started out at the same level.…”
Section: Public Transportationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UK auctions (in London) were small and highly transparent, while the French auctions were bigger and less transparent [10]. Operating costs ended up being a lot lower in London, although costs started out at the same level.…”
Section: Public Transportationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An important mechanism to open the sector to competition is competitive tendering through auctioning. The idea is to "replace competition in the field by competition for the field" [10]. The higher the number of bidders, the more aggressively they should bid and the lower the final prices should be.…”
Section: Public Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources : Merk, et al, 2012;OECD, 2007aOECD, , 2008aOECD/ITF, 2008b;Amaral et al, 2008;ADB and World Bank, 2006. …”
Section: Box 7 Principles For Transparent and Competitive Pppsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by establishing independent regulatory regimes to encourage private providers to invest sufficiently in service provision and guarantee the fairness of user fees) (Meakin, 2004;Zegras, 2002). Experiences with introducing competition in tenders include the London model of urban public transport, which uses the transparency of auction procedures and the discretionary authority of the regulator to foster competition and avoid anticompetitive practices (Amaral et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the design of awarding procedures is also emphasized by Amaral et al (2009) who argue that the French procedures are conducive to both corruption and collusion. The latter is supported by the fact that the big three operators were fined for collusive behavior in 2005.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%