2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical cortical entrainment to speech in the right hemisphere underpins phonemic deficits in dyslexia

Abstract: Developmental dyslexia is a multifaceted disorder of learning primarily manifested by difficulties in reading, spelling, and phonological processing. Neural studies suggest that phonological difficulties may reflect impairments in fundamental cortical oscillatory mechanisms. Here we examine cortical mechanisms in children (6-12 years of age) with or without dyslexia (utilising both age- and reading-level-matched controls) using electroencephalography (EEG). EEG data were recorded as participants listened to an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
132
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
132
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, even though mothers were unaware of the fact that their infants were responding to a different interlocutor, they were sensitive to the disconnect between their own communicative behaviors and their infants' feedback, which resulted in adjustments in their pitch production to their infants. While we do not provide direct evidence that such disturbances are related to infants' risk of dyslexia in our study, there is ample evidence that neural coupling to speech is impaired in children and adults diagnosed with dyslexia (e.g., Di Liberto et al, 2018;Molinaro, Lizarazu, Lallier, Bourguignon, & Carreiras, 2016;Power, Colling, Mead, Barnes, & Goswami, 2016;Power, Mead, Barnes, & Goswami, 2013). To date, neural entrainment to continuous speech has not been tested in at-risk infants, but there is reduced discrimination of amplitude envelope rise time differences in at-risk infants .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In their study, even though mothers were unaware of the fact that their infants were responding to a different interlocutor, they were sensitive to the disconnect between their own communicative behaviors and their infants' feedback, which resulted in adjustments in their pitch production to their infants. While we do not provide direct evidence that such disturbances are related to infants' risk of dyslexia in our study, there is ample evidence that neural coupling to speech is impaired in children and adults diagnosed with dyslexia (e.g., Di Liberto et al, 2018;Molinaro, Lizarazu, Lallier, Bourguignon, & Carreiras, 2016;Power, Colling, Mead, Barnes, & Goswami, 2016;Power, Mead, Barnes, & Goswami, 2013). To date, neural entrainment to continuous speech has not been tested in at-risk infants, but there is reduced discrimination of amplitude envelope rise time differences in at-risk infants .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Further, recent studies with adults show that low‐frequency cortical oscillations (<8 Hz) also carry phonetic information directly (Di Liberto, O'Sullivan, & Lalor, ). This low frequency oscillatory phonetic information is represented atypically in children with developmental dyslexia (Di Liberto et al, ) at right hemisphere cortical locations. This provides direct evidence that atypical oscillatory entrainment to slower modulations (<10 Hz) has negative consequences for the development of phoneme awareness, as predicted by TS theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phase alignment in turn determines systematic, stimulus-locked variations in neuronal activity, as indexed by fluctuations in broadband high-frequency activity. It was further shown that visual speech gestures enhance intelligibility by facilitating auditory cortical entrainment to the speech stream (Crosse, Butler and Lalor, 2015;Perrodin et al, 2015;Park et al, 2016Park et al, , 2018Di Liberto et al, 2018;Micheli et al, 2018). Here, we used iEEG recordings for a more direct examination of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying visual enhancement of auditory cortical speech processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rhythmic features of speech are critical for it to be intelligible (Shannon et al, 1995;Greenberg et al, 2003). Second, auditory cortex synchronizes its oscillations to the rhythm of heard speech, and the magnitude of this synchronization correlates with the intelligibility of speech (Ahissar et al, 2001;Luo and Poeppel, 2007;Ghinst et al, 2016;Di Liberto et al, 2018;Keitel, Gross and Kayser, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%