2019
DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural oscillations perspective on phonological development and phonological processing in developmental dyslexia

Abstract: Children's ability to reflect upon and manipulate the sounds in words (“phonological awareness”) develops as part of natural language acquisition, supports reading acquisition, and develops further as reading and spelling are learned. Children with developmental dyslexia typically have impairments in phonological awareness. Many developmental factors contribute to individual differences in phonological development. One important source of individual differences may be the child's sensory/neural processing of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since rhythmic grouping preferences are asymmetrical between the perceived acoustic cues, these biases cannot simply be accounted for by a tracking of acoustic cues to prominence in the signal. Importantly, asymmetries in rhythmic grouping are mirrored in the rhythm structures in language and music where final prominence is usually marked by a long syllable or note, and initial prominence by a loud syllable or beat, which supports the assumption of the ITL as universal [19]. More recent research, however, indicates that rhythmic grouping preferences are subject to individual variation and depend to some degree on aspects such as individuals' language background [38,[47][48][49][50] and their musical abilities [51,52].…”
Section: Biases On Auditory Rhythmic Groupingmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since rhythmic grouping preferences are asymmetrical between the perceived acoustic cues, these biases cannot simply be accounted for by a tracking of acoustic cues to prominence in the signal. Importantly, asymmetries in rhythmic grouping are mirrored in the rhythm structures in language and music where final prominence is usually marked by a long syllable or note, and initial prominence by a loud syllable or beat, which supports the assumption of the ITL as universal [19]. More recent research, however, indicates that rhythmic grouping preferences are subject to individual variation and depend to some degree on aspects such as individuals' language background [38,[47][48][49][50] and their musical abilities [51,52].…”
Section: Biases On Auditory Rhythmic Groupingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Goswami [5,19] has proposed that a fundamental deficit in the processing of rhythmic information is associated with dyslexia. This account focuses on the periodic modulations of amplitude (amplitude envelope) that are crucial to establish speech rhythm with amplitude peaks being aligned with the strong (stressed) syllables of a speech sequence and Goswami assumes that the processing of this amplitude envelope is impeded in dyslexia.…”
Section: Rhythm Perception Deficits In Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, rhythmic-prosodic sensitivity has been proposed as fundamental stepping stone into literacy [27][28][29] as well as implicit driver for skilled reading [30]. Breen et al [11] and Fotidzis et al [8] present converging EEG evidence for implicit rhythmic processing in silent reading of words in literate adults and children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Current neurophysiological models assume that speech and music processing as well as the catalytic role of rhythm in language development are based on the synchronization of internal neuronal oscillations with temporally regular stimuli [27,[31][32][33]. The review article by Myers et al [15] summarizes the current state of knowledge about neuronal entrainment to the speech envelope reflecting quasi-regular amplitude fluctuations over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation