Attitudes Towards Dating Violence Scales

Price, Elizabeth; Byers, E. Sandra

doi:10.1037/t24728-000

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Attitudes Toward Dating Violence Scales. This instrument focuses on the measurement of attitudes toward physical, psychological, and sexual violence toward both men and women (Price & Byers, 1999). A total of 70 items were loaded on six scales specifically measuring permissiveness toward physical, psychological, and sexual DV toward men and women and recording responses using a four-point Likert-type scale (1 = Agree Strongly to 4 = Disagree strongly).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Attitudes toward sexual violence were not calculated due to over 62% missing data on these items due to a survey error. (Price & Byers, 1999).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The physical and psychological DV attitudes subscales were calculated by first reverse scoring responses to indicated items on the scale and then summing them up; higher scores in each of the scales indicate more permissive or tolerant DV attitudes. Examples of items for the physical violence DV attitudes subscale are “A guy should not hit his girlfriend,” and “A girl should break up with a guy when he hits her.” Examples of items on the psychological DV attitudes scale include “A guy should not tell his girlfriend what to do,” and “A girl should always change her ways to please her boyfriend.” Construct validity was assessed by obtaining high correlations between Attitudes Toward Dating Violence Scale scores and traditional gender role ideology, and rates of victimization and perpetration of DV within the same sample used to validate the measure (Price & Byers, 1999). In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha reliability for the physical DV attitudes subscale was .94 and for the psychological DV attitudes scale it was .94.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cultural Correlates of Dating Violence in a Combined Gender Group of Latino College Students

Terrazas-Carrillo,

Sabina,

Vásquez

et al. 2023

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prevalence rates of dating violence (DV) on college campuses are high. The documented effects of DV suggest substantial challenges across all domains of functioning; yet, DV is preventable. The research on risk and preventive factors for Latino college students is limited. This study used the social–ecological model to examine factors associated with DV at the individual, relationship, and societal levels. More specifically, we utilized structural equation modeling to build an acceptable model of physical and psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) experiences for Latino participants based on variables of gender role beliefs, acculturation, attitudes toward violence, and surveillance behavior, while considering development issues. We describe the practice and prevention implications of the study findings. Overall, the model showed excellent model fit (χ2[40] = 52.06, p < .09, root mean square error of approximation = 0.025, comparative fit index = 0.99, Tucker–Lewis Index = 0.98, and a coefficient of determination of 0.04), and several proposed pathways were found to be significant, exhibiting the utility of this model in understanding Latino Dating violence. Maternal education was found to be significantly negatively associated with Mexican orientation (β = −.13, p = .02) and indirectly associated with both DV attitudes and surveillance through Mexican orientation, suggesting protective effects for lower maternal education and higher Mexican orientation. Machismo (β = .18, p = .002) and caballerismo (β = .26, p < .001) were both related to IPV attitudes. Machismo also directly increased the risk of surveillance (β = .21, p < .001) and indirectly increased the risk of physical and psychological victimization through surveillance behavior. Mexican orientation predicted less endorsement of DV attitudes (β = −.16, p < .001) and less surveillance (β = −.09, p = .04). Victimization was predicted by caballerismo (β = −.19, p < .001) and surveillance (β = .33, p < .001).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Attitudes toward sexual violence were not calculated due to over 62% missing data on these items due to a survey error. (Price & Byers, 1999).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cultural Correlates of Dating Violence in a Combined Gender Group of Latino College Students

Terrazas-Carrillo,

Sabina,

Vásquez

et al. 2023

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Violence acceptance includes outcomes based on scales that measure participants' acceptance of DRV or GBV. The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (Payne et al 1999) 268 or the Attitudes Toward Dating Violence Scale (Price et al 1999) 269 are archetypal scales for this construct. Of the 28 trials presenting DRV-related violence acceptance outcomes, 23 presented short-term outcomes and 8 presented long-term outcomes.…”

Section: Dating and Relationship Violence And Gender-based Violence K...mentioning

confidence: 99%

School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review

Melendez-Torres,

Orr,

Farmer

et al. 2024

Public Health Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Schools have a duty of care to prevent violence between students but a significant amount of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence occurs in schools. These are important public health issues with important longitudinal consequences for young people. Objectives To understand functioning and effectiveness of school-based interventions for the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence. Review methods We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesise different types of evidence relating to school-based interventions for the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence to understand if, how and in what ways these interventions are effective. We searched 21 databases and 2 trial registers and undertook forwards and backwards citation chasing, author contact and other supplementary search methods. Searches identified all literature published to June 2021. All screening was undertaken in duplicate and independently, and we quality appraised all included studies. Results We included 247 reports (68 outcome evaluations, 137 process evaluations). Synthesis of intervention components produced an intervention typology: single-component, curricular, multicomponent, and multilevel programmes. Synthesis of intervention theories suggested that interventions aiming to increase students’ sense of school belonging and sense of safety in the school building could encourage increased learning of prosocial skills and increased prosocial peer norms, and so potentially reducing dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence. Synthesis of factors affecting delivery highlighted school organisation and leaders who believed in the importance of addressing dating and relationship violence/gender-based violence, along with time and resources to deliver the interventions. The ease with which the intervention could be delivered and modified was also important. Meta-analysis found stronger evidence for intervention effectiveness in reducing dating and relationship violence than for gender-based violence, with significant long-term impacts on dating and relationship violence victimisation and perpetration, and some evidence that interventions in high-income countries could be effective for reducing victimisation and perpetration of gender-based violence in the long-term. Impacts on knowledge and attitudes were primarily short-term. Network meta-analysis did not suggest superiority of any intervention type. Moderation evidence suggested interventions reduced dating and relationship violence perpetration in boys more than girls, but reduced gender-based violence perpetration more in girls. Metaregression by intervention component did not explain heterogeneity in effectiveness, but qualitative comparative analysis suggested that reducing perpetration was important to reducing victimisation, and that perpetration could be reduced via focus on interpersonal skills, guided practice and (for gender-based violence) implementation of social structural components. Limitations Despite an exhaustive search, trials may have been missed and risk of publication bias was high for several analyses. Conclusions This is the most comprehensive systematic review of school-based interventions for dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence to date. It is clear that the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence in schools will require longer-term investment to show benefit. Future work Future research is needed to understand why intervention effectiveness appears stronger for dating and relationship violence than gender-based violence. Study registration The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020190463. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130144) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

show abstract

“…Las trece escalas incluidas en este apartado analizan las actitudes que tienen tanto hombres como mujeres hacia la VG. Valoran si están de acuerdo o no que se ejerza algún tipo de violencia, ya sea en el noviazgo (AMDV y AFDV; Price et al, 1999;y DAI;Schwartz et al, 2012), o cuando están ya casados (DAI; Saunders et al, 1987); las actitudes hacia la VG como el abuso psicológico, la violencia física y las conductas de control (IP-VAS-R; Fincham et al, 2008); el nivel de aceptabilidad de la VG (A-IPVAW; Martín-Fernández et al, 2018a); si se culpabiliza a la víctima en casos de VG (VB-IPVAW; Martín-Fernández et al, 2018a); o el nivel de tolerancia hacia la VG (WI-IPAVW; Martín-Fernández et al, 2018b); si se aceptan los mitos sobre la agresión sexual (AMMSA; Gerger et al, 2007;Bohner, et al, 2022); o se aceptan los mitos sobre la VG (AMIVAW; Megías, et al, 2018;y DVMAS;Lelaurain et al, 2018); o las actitudes favorables a la violación (RSAS; Lottes, 1991;Sierra et al, 2007); o hacia el tráfico sexual (STAS; Houston-Kolnik, 2016).…”

Section: Actitudes Hacia La Violencia De Génerounclassified

Violencia de Género: Una Revisión de Instrumentos de Medida

García¹,

Vinagre-González²

2022

REV IBEROAM DIAGN EV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

validados con las poblaciones de estudio. Se realiza una búsqueda de instrumentos de evaluación en PsycINFO con las palabras clave "gender violence" "measur*" "validation", obteniendo veintinueve instrumentos. En el estudio se añaden otros diecinueve que miden la violencia de género tanto directa como indirectamente, y que se conocían por investigaciones previas, pero que no se obtienen en la búsqueda en PsycINFO. Los cuestionarios se clasifican en cuatro áreas según su posibilidad de uso: actitudes hacia la violencia, ámbito policial/judicial, ámbito sociosanitario y percepción de diferencias de género o sexismo. Los resultados muestran cuarenta y ocho instrumentos incluyendo los indicadores de fiabilidad y validez disponibles. Se discute si los sistemas de búsqueda permiten o no encontrar todos los instrumentos de forma directa o hay que añadir otros recursos alternativos.

show abstract

Attitudes Towards Dating Violence Scales

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Cultural Correlates of Dating Violence in a Combined Gender Group of Latino College Students

Cultural Correlates of Dating Violence in a Combined Gender Group of Latino College Students

School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review

Violencia de Género: Una Revisión de Instrumentos de Medida

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About