2011
DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.4104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes toward Traditional Marriage: A Comparison of TANF Recipients and a General Population of Adults

Abstract: Marriage enhancement programs enacted under the federal Healthy Marriage Initiative imply that marriage behaviors and attitudes of poor women are different from those of the middle class, and that the cash assistance program is an appropriate venue to change these attitudes.A population of long-term recipients of public cash assistance and a random sample of general population adults were compared regarding views toward traditional marriage. The general population was significantly more aligned with views of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of vulnerable populations, comparisons have often been made in order to obtain a ‘benchmark’ with which to compare the situation, characteristics, views, etc. of the vulnerable group (see e.g., Bullock, ; Muñoz, Vázquez, & Vásquez, ; Taylor & Vogel‐Ferguson, ). Nevertheless, while providing valuable information that cannot be obtained by other means, the nature of the hard‐to‐reach population and related methodological challenges of data collection have to be considered when interpreting results (see Swärd, ; also Cohen & Wagner, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of vulnerable populations, comparisons have often been made in order to obtain a ‘benchmark’ with which to compare the situation, characteristics, views, etc. of the vulnerable group (see e.g., Bullock, ; Muñoz, Vázquez, & Vásquez, ; Taylor & Vogel‐Ferguson, ). Nevertheless, while providing valuable information that cannot be obtained by other means, the nature of the hard‐to‐reach population and related methodological challenges of data collection have to be considered when interpreting results (see Swärd, ; also Cohen & Wagner, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%