2013
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtt015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes toward forest diversity and forest ecosystem services—a cross-cultural comparison between China and Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the frequency of nature that appeared in photographs varied widely across countries. This variation could be related to cultural and sociodemographic differences 34,35 . For example, it has been shown that Menominee Native Americans spend more time interacting with nature directly in their outdoor activities, as compared to European Americans 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the frequency of nature that appeared in photographs varied widely across countries. This variation could be related to cultural and sociodemographic differences 34,35 . For example, it has been shown that Menominee Native Americans spend more time interacting with nature directly in their outdoor activities, as compared to European Americans 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review shows that these social groups might differ not only in where they live but also in sociodemographic characteristics, including education level, age, and sex. Second, environmental education programs can be targeted to specific groups to highlight the importance of underrecognized ES to their well-being (Racevskis and Lupi 2006, Carvalho-Ribeiro and Lovett 2011, Lindemann-Matthies et al 2013, Mombo et al 2014. In fact, Casado-Arzuaga and colleagues (2013) have shown that the information communicated can transform ES preferences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers' authors either adopted an ecological (e.g., watershed, river basin, forest) or political boundary (e.g., municipality, region), or no boundary was specified. In the latter case, for example, one paper was focused on archetypal forests from China and Switzerland (Lindemann-Matthies et al 2013). Most papers used a combination of ecological and political boundaries, prioritizing one or the other.…”
Section: Portrait Of the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although exclosures have been established since 2006 in Gomit watershed, empirical data on the effectiveness of these protected areas in improving aboveground carbon, the economic returns of improved aboveground carbon, and the impacts of exclosures on livelihoods are lacking. Further, members of different cultures or cultural groups may value forest biodiversity and ecosystem services differently and, as a consequence, may or may not support conservation goals set by governance bodies (Deng et al 2006;Lindemann-Matthies et al 2014). There is a need to understand the perception of local communities on the effectiveness of exclosures in restoring degraded ecosystems and improving livelihoods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%