Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors

Kolodinsky, Robert W.; Madden, Timothy M.; Zisk, Daniel S.; Henkel, Eric T.

doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0075-3

Cited by 168 publications

(134 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

131

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Current debates attempt to assign economic and social responsibilities to companies and students (Basu & Palazzo, 2008;Kolodinsky, Madden, Zisk, & Henkel, 2010) and discuss academia's influence on perceptions of such responsibilities (Pfeffer, 2005;Trank & Rynes, 2003). An acceptance of responsibilities depends on the person's underlying values, according to the established link between values and related behaviors.…”

Section: Economic and Social Value Perspectives In Management Academimentioning

confidence: 99%

A Model of Management Academics' Intentions to Influence Values

Moosmayer¹

2012

AMLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Economic and Social Value Perspectives In Management Academimentioning

confidence: 99%

A Model of Management Academics' Intentions to Influence Values

Moosmayer¹

2012

AMLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In another study, relativists are shown to be more accepting of violating property rights (Winter et al 2004). Business undergraduates at a U.S. university who score higher on relativism score lower on corporate social responsibility, the extent to which they take the wider social impact of their business into account instead of just caring about profits and stockholders (Kolodinsky et al 2010). Nichols (2004) categorized adult participants as moral non-objectivists if they said that there was no fact of the matter regarding a moral disagreement; otherwise, they were classified as moral objectivists.…”

Section: Confidencementioning

confidence: 96%

Varying versions of moral relativism: the philosophy and psychology of normative relativism

Quintelier

Fessler

2011

Biol Philos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among naturalist philosophers, both defenders and opponents of moral relativism argue that prescriptive moral theories (or normative theories) should be constrained by empirical findings about human psychology. Empiricists have asked if people are or can be moral relativists, and what effect being a moral relativist can have on an individual's moral functioning. This research is underutilized in philosophers' normative theories of relativism; at the same time, the empirical work, while useful, is conceptually disjointed. Our goal is to integrate philosophical and empirical work on constraints on normative relativism. First, we present a working definition of moral relativism. Second, we outline naturalist versions of normative relativism, and third, we highlight the empirical constraints in this reasoning. Fourth, we discuss recent studies in moral psychology that are relevant for the philosophy of moral relativism. We assess here what conclusions for moral relativism can and cannot be drawn from experimental studies. Finally, we suggest how moral philosophers and moral psychologists can collaborate on the topic of moral relativism in the future. Keywords moral relativism; moral psychology; experimental ethics; normative ethics; tolerance Moral Relativism and its oppositesThe goal of this paper is to integrate recent naturalist philosophical and moral psychological work on moral relativism. Philosophers draw distinctions between cultural and individual relativism, and between extreme and moderate moral relativism, and ask what moral prescriptions are in accordance with human psychology. However, moral psychologists generally do not employ these distinctions, making it difficult to examine the extent to which their research findings can or cannot be compared to various philosophical positions. We aim to bridge this disciplinary divide and integrate this conceptual landscape in contemporary and future research. Where appropriate, we will MANUSCRIPT CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW. PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE WITHOUT PERMISSION.

show abstract

“…In fact, most studies have examined corporate sustainability as either the independent or dependent variable and at different levels of analysis (Aguinis & Glavas, 2012;D'Aprile & Talo, 2015;Jones, Selby, & Sterling, 2010;Kolodinsky, Madden, Zisk, & Henkel, 2010). In fact, quite a number of past researches on the construct have focused mainly on the environmental dimensions of the construct, with less on the organizational business aspect.…”

Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Corporate Sustainability Influence Employee Engagement?

Simon¹,

Zhou²

2018

IJHRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global financial meltdown of 2008 has left many developing countries still trying to rebuild their economies and their labour forces. The aftermaths of the recession have inspired more businesses to incorporate sustainability into their business strategies. The sluggish growth, low productivity and other social, environmental and organizational factors have had an effect on the workforce. The unprecedented effects and outcome of disengagement worldwide have called leaders to find various initiatives to improve employee engagement. Rabid competition, coupled with the global figures of employee engagement has continued to attract both scholars and industry. The arguments put forward in this conceptual paper is meant to generate awareness as well as inspire further research into understanding how corporate sustainability might influence engagement of employees.

show abstract

Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors

Abstract: ethics, ethical ideologies, corporate social responsibility, CSR, materialism, relativism, idealism, Forsyth,

Cited by 168 publications

References 68 publications

A Model of Management Academics' Intentions to Influence Values

A Model of Management Academics' Intentions to Influence Values

Varying versions of moral relativism: the philosophy and psychology of normative relativism

Can Corporate Sustainability Influence Employee Engagement?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About