Handbook of Social Psychology 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 336 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attitudes, on the other hand, are more transient and situation-specific (Banaji & Heiphetz, 2010;Canetti-Nisim, Halperin, Sharvit, & Hobfoll, 2009;Konty & Dunham, 1997;Wood, 2000).…”
Section: Change and Stability In Value Orientations And Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attitudes, on the other hand, are more transient and situation-specific (Banaji & Heiphetz, 2010;Canetti-Nisim, Halperin, Sharvit, & Hobfoll, 2009;Konty & Dunham, 1997;Wood, 2000).…”
Section: Change and Stability In Value Orientations And Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable interest in the concept of implicit attitudes has been shown over the past two decades, both in academic outlets (e.g., Banaji & Heiphetz, 2010; Gawronski & Payne, 2010; Jost, Pelham & Carvallo, 2002; Nosek, Hawkins, & Frazier, 2012; Petty, Fazio, & Brinol, 2008; Quillian, 2008; Wittenbrink & Schwartz, 2007) and in the popular media (Gladwell, 2005; Tierney, 2008a, 2008b; The Economist, 2012; Dateline NBC, 2007; Oprah.com, 2006). The term implicit attitude is generally used to refer to an attitude (evaluation or preference) that is inferred from indirect, performance-based procedures (most popularly the Implicit Association Test [IAT], Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) that avoid the direct influence of deliberative processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we think about, perceive, or interact with someone, a critical determinant of our psychological response is the evaluative reaction elicited by that person (Allport, 1935; Banaji & Heiphetz, 2010). In the domain of intergroup relations, evaluations of outgroup members are often affected by general attitudes towards their social category, so much so that this group-based attitude may change our perception of that person's unique characteristics and behavior (Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; Sagar & Schofield, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%