Attitude toward recovery and completion of a substance abuse treatment program

Britt, Gena Covell; Knisely, Janet S.; Dawson, Keith; Schnoll, Sidney H.

doi:10.1016/0740-5472(95)02004-6

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1995) and the RAATE-R (r = .42; Najavits et al, 1997). However, Britt et al (1995) reported that 6 of 10 intercorrelations were significant (r 2 .50 in four cases). However, Britt et al (1995) reported that 6 of 10 intercorrelations were significant (r 2 .50 in four cases).…”

Section: Raate-ce and Raate-r: Validity Factorial Evidencementioning

confidence: 93%

“…Among 113 pregnant and postpartum women in substance abuse treatment, those who dropped out in the first month had higher scores on both Resistance scales (Britt et al, 1995). The two Resistance scales were highly related (r = .62), and moderate associations were found between Bio-medical and Psychiatric Acuity (r = .46), Psychiatric Acuity and Psychosocial Support (r = .44), and Biomedical Acuity and Psychosocial Support (r = .29).…”

Section: Raate: Rliditymentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The Resistance to Treatment and Resistance to Continuing care scales appear to be most closely related, both in the RAATE-CE (r = .83, Britt et al, 1995;r = .73, Gasehiend, Filstead;' Reif, Najavits, & Parrella. The Resistance to Treatment and Resistance to Continuing care scales appear to be most closely related, both in the RAATE-CE (r = .83, Britt et al, 1995;r = .73, Gasehiend, Filstead;' Reif, Najavits, & Parrella.…”

Section: Raate-ce and Raate-r: Validity Factorial Evidencementioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: a critical review of instruments

Carey¹

1999

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This literature review summarizes the psychometric properties of 12 measures used to assess readiness to change substance abuse. Assessment methods vary, and indude algorithms, self-administered questionnaires, and clinical ratings. We describe each and summarize reliability and validity information. Some measures have poor psychometric properties, whereas limited psychometric data are available for others. No single measure emerges as best for use in clinical settings, and promising candidates dlffer regarding target population and assessment method. Atthough the Transtheomtical Model inspired much of the empirical work on readiness to change, the psychometric Iiterature provides inconsistent support for the stages of change. Readiness to change may best be conceptualized as a multidimensional and continuous construct with complex relationships to behavior, cognition, and environmental context.

show abstract

Section: Raate-ce and Raate-r: Validity Factorial Evidencementioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Raate: Rliditymentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Raate-ce and Raate-r: Validity Factorial Evidencementioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: a critical review of instruments

Carey¹

1999

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Factorial evidence for the validity of the RAATE‐QI was not presented, but Britt, Knisely, Dawson, and Schnoll (1995) reported on scale intercorre‐lations. The two Resistance scales were highly related ( r = .62), and moderate associations were found between Bio‐medical and Psychiatric Acuity ( r = .46), Psychiatric Acuity and Psychosocial Support ( r = .44), and Biomedical Acuity and Psychosocial Support ( r = .29).…”

Section: Review Of Rtc Measurement Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: A critical review of instruments.

Carey¹,

Purnine²,

Maisto³

et al. 1999

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

142

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The term dropout (DO) has been used to describe the unilateral ending of regular treatment by a patient (Mahon, 2000) and the term administrative discharge (AD) has been used to refer to patients who are discharged by the treatment team (Britt, Kinsely, Dawson, & Schnoll, 1995;Goldberg & Leibenluft, 1989). There is little agreement as to whether patients who DO or are administratively discharged from treatment should be examined as two different patient groups.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Premature termination of treatment in an inpatient eating disorder programme

Masson

Perlman

Ross

et al. 2006

Euro Eating Disorders Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This retrospective study was conducted to explore rates, timing and predictors of two forms of premature termination of treatment (PTT) in an inpatient eating disorders programme: patient dropout (DO) and administrative discharge (AD). A chart review was conducted to obtain demographic, Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2), and Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH) data for 186 patients being treated for bulimia nervosa (BN), anorexia nervosa (AN), or eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Overall, of the 37.6% of patients who terminated treatment prematurely, 22.1% of patients dropped out, and 15.5% of patients were administratively discharged. Time at which discharge occurred was found to be associated with the type of premature termination. The presence of DSM-IV Axis-I comorbidity was found to be the only factor associated with an increased risk of being administratively discharged. No factors were predictive of patients dropping out of treatment. The findings support the notion that AD and patient DO are different events that may have different factors influencing their rates and timing. Implications for future research and programme planning are discussed.

show abstract

Attitude toward recovery and completion of a substance abuse treatment program

Cited by 11 publications

References 20 publications

Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: a critical review of instruments

Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: a critical review of instruments

Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: A critical review of instruments.

Premature termination of treatment in an inpatient eating disorder programme

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About