2022
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2022.3201812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude Coordination Control for Flexible Spacecraft Formation Flying With Guaranteed Performance Bounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In equation (15), under the certain premise of m, the algorithm time complexity increases exponentially with the increase of n. Therefore, the time complexity of the SQP algorithm is negligible compared to that of the DFS algorithm, 25,26 which is…”
Section: Analysis Of the Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In equation (15), under the certain premise of m, the algorithm time complexity increases exponentially with the increase of n. Therefore, the time complexity of the SQP algorithm is negligible compared to that of the DFS algorithm, 25,26 which is…”
Section: Analysis Of the Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ε2 in equation (2) is 0, the orbit extrapolation equation (5) and component equation (6) can be numerically integrated. 15,16 This can calculate the observation time Ti which satisfies the observation constraint conditions. Let the shortest time to complete orbital phase modulation be Tmin, and the shortest time Ti is T when the Ti>Tmin condition is satisfied…”
Section: Problem Description and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the initial values of the control parameters are set based on theoretical analysis and engineering experience, then these parameters are adjusted through many numerical simulations until the relevant dynamic indicators of the system satisfy the project requirements [16]. Such an operation that presets partial parameters not only restricts the coupling relationship between the error states in the controller but also predetermines the stable hovering accuracy of the system states, thus affecting the robustness of the designed controller [17,18]. In addition, the expression of the unmatched disturbance is also determined by the prescribed control parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The command filter backstepping control method was employed to address the limitations of other methods such as dynamic surface control and tracking-differentiator-based control. On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that unmodeled dynamics are inherent in real-world systems owing to various factors such as modeling inaccuracies, external disturbances, and measurement noise [14][15][16][17][18]. These unmodeled dynamics can significantly degrade system performance and even cause instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%