2003
DOI: 10.1080/03637750302474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude Accessibility as an Alternative Explanation for How Inoculation Confers Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process unleashed embodies the concept of counterarguing. Studies by Pfau and colleagues (Pfau et al, 1997(Pfau et al, , 2001(Pfau et al, , 2003(Pfau et al, , 2004, which operationalized both threat and counterarguing, confirmed that both elements play pivotal roles in the process of resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The process unleashed embodies the concept of counterarguing. Studies by Pfau and colleagues (Pfau et al, 1997(Pfau et al, , 2001(Pfau et al, , 2003(Pfau et al, , 2004, which operationalized both threat and counterarguing, confirmed that both elements play pivotal roles in the process of resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, recent research (Pfau et al, 2003(Pfau et al, , 2004 also indicates that the mechanisms of threat and counterarguing provide only a partial explanation for the way inoculation confers resistance. In addition to these elements, inoculation works, in part, by rendering attitudes more accessible and enhancing attitude certainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because the college climate is one of extensive social interactions, and research indicates that WOM travels via both strong and weak social ties (e.g.. Brown & Reingen, 1987), the possibility of word-of-mouth inoculation warrants exploration in the context of credit card targeting. Additionally, WOM research suggests that the content of WOM communications is highly accessible (Herr, Kardes, & Kim, 1991), and inoculation has been shown to enhance attitude accessibility (Pfau et al, 2003).…”
Section: Word-of-mouth Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as a biological inoculation injects a weakened version of a virus to enable that person to build resistance against fiature attack, an inoculation treatment presents a weakened version of a future attitude attack to motivate those treated to build attitude resistance through the process of counterarguing and refiitations. Inoculation works to confer resistance, as supported by laboratory experiments (e.g., Pfau et al, 2003) and has been successfiilly used in applied settings like political campaigns (e.g., Pfau, Park, Holbert, & Cho, 2001), public relations (e.g.. Wan & Pfau, 2004), and advertising (e.g., Burgoon, Pfau, & Birk, 1995). In addition, the theory is supported by research involving adolescent health preventative contexts, including smoking prevention (e.g., Szabo & Pfau, 2002) and drinking prevention (e.g., Godbold & Pfau, 2000).…”
Section: The Inoculation Process Of Resistance To Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation