2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02496.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of sucrose reinforcement in dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice

Abstract: Dopaminergic systems are thought to mediate the rewarding and reinforcing effects of palatable food. However, the relative contribution of different dopamine receptor subtypes is not clear. We used dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice (D1 -/-) and their wild-type and heterozygous littermates to study the role of the D1 receptor in palatable food reinforced behaviour using operant responding and free access paradigms. Non-deprived mice were trained to press a lever for sucrose pellets under three schedules of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(54 reference statements)
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the decreased food consumption observed in the raclopride-treated mice in the present study (Figure 4b) may be secondary to the observed reduction in activity (Supplementary Figure S2A in Supplementary Information). This would be in agreement with previous findings where feeding and motor functions of D2, but not of D1 (El-Ghundi et al, 2003), were difficult to distinguish (Caine et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2000a). However, in the present study, raclopride effects on activity were comparable to, if not lower than, those of SCH23390 (Supplementary Figures S1A and S2A in Supplementary Information), which did not cause any reductions in food intake.…”
Section: Effects Of the Dopaminergic D1-type And D2-type Antagonists supporting
confidence: 94%
“…It could be argued that the decreased food consumption observed in the raclopride-treated mice in the present study (Figure 4b) may be secondary to the observed reduction in activity (Supplementary Figure S2A in Supplementary Information). This would be in agreement with previous findings where feeding and motor functions of D2, but not of D1 (El-Ghundi et al, 2003), were difficult to distinguish (Caine et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2000a). However, in the present study, raclopride effects on activity were comparable to, if not lower than, those of SCH23390 (Supplementary Figures S1A and S2A in Supplementary Information), which did not cause any reductions in food intake.…”
Section: Effects Of the Dopaminergic D1-type And D2-type Antagonists supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Pre-clinical studies have shown that dopamine acting through D1 receptors decreases an animal's desire to work for food rather than the animal's desire to ingest food (42). In an experiment in which D1 receptor knockout mice exhibited reduced lever pressing for a sucrose reward, home cage sucrose consumption was similar to that of wild-type controls (20). This finding suggests that loss of D1 receptors affects motivation but not appetite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Neuroleptics injected into the nucleus accumbens of rats increased the time to reach a sucrose reward in a straight alley but do not modify the amount of sucrose consumed once it is attained (Ikemoto and Panksepp 1996). D 1 and D 2 mutant mice did not show any modification on basal food intake compared to wild-type mice when maintained on a palatable, fatenriched or sucrose diet (El-Ghundi et al 2003;. Altogether, interfering with brain dopamine neurotransmission seems to be ineffective to remove food of its primary rewarding value.…”
Section: Dopamine Is Not Involved In Food Palatability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 88%