2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuated live vaccine usage affects accurate measures of virus diversity and mutation rates in avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus

Abstract: The full-length genomes of 11 infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) field isolates from three different types of the virus; Massachusetts (Mass), Connecticut (Conn) and California (CAL) isolated over a 41, 25 and 8 year period respectively, were sequenced and analyzed to determine the mutation rates and level of polymorphisms across the genome. Positive selection was not detected and mutation rates ranged from 10(-4) to 10(-6)substitutions/site/year for Mass and Conn IBV types where attenuated live vaccines are ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the replicase proteins in open reading frame 1ab have been shown to be associated with pathogenicity (Ammayappan et al, 2009). However, the spike gene in IBV appears to be the most reliable measure of genetic change leading to the emergence of new viruses capable of causing disease (McKinley et al, 2011). Indeed, our previous results have confirmed that population analyses based on S1 genotype/phenotype allow assessment of IBV drift (Gallardo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For example, the replicase proteins in open reading frame 1ab have been shown to be associated with pathogenicity (Ammayappan et al, 2009). However, the spike gene in IBV appears to be the most reliable measure of genetic change leading to the emergence of new viruses capable of causing disease (McKinley et al, 2011). Indeed, our previous results have confirmed that population analyses based on S1 genotype/phenotype allow assessment of IBV drift (Gallardo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The replication of coronavirus genomes, including that of IBV, requires a step in which a set of subgenomic RNAs is generated. This mechanism promotes homologous recombination events (McKinley et al, 2011). Recombination contributes to the genetic 1 4/91 vaccine NC b 0/10 c 0/10 0/10 0/10 3/10 6/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 d 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 2 NV ck/CH/LSD/110851 0/10 0/10 -----0/10 9/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 3 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LSD/110851 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 3/10 5/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 4 NV ck/CH/LSD/110857 0/10 0/10 ------0/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 5 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LSD/110857 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 3/10 5/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 6 NV e ck/CH/LHB/130575 5/10 0/10 ------0/10 8/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 7 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LHB/130575 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 4/10 5/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 8 NV ck/CH/LGD/090907 10/10 2/10 ------0/10 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 9 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LGD/090907 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 3/10 6/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10 NV ck/CH/LGD/120723 10/10 7/10 ------0/10 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 11 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LGD/120723 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 3/10 5/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 12 NV ck/CH/LHLJ/04V 10/10 3/10 ------0/10 8/8 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 13 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LHLJ/04V 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 2/10 6/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 14 NV ck/CH/LDL/091022 10/10 2/10 ------0/10 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 15 4/91 vaccine ck/CH/LDL/091022 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 3/10 6/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 16 NV NC 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 a Days after vaccination/challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, yet impossible to predict based on a genetic sequence whether the IBV strain is sufficiently attenuated, while potent enough to induce and effective immune response. In addition, the use of attenuated live-vaccines poses a risk of residual pathogenicity associated with vaccine backpassage in flocks (Abro et al, 2012;McKinley et al, 2011;OIE, 2013). Despite this, live attenuated IBV vaccines are still the golden standard to protect chickens from IBV, as immune responses are high.…”
Section: Live-attenuated Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%