1967
DOI: 10.2307/2799336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention Structure as the Basis of Primate Rank Orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
196
1
5

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
196
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Converging lines of research show that young children (3-4 year olds) automatically track the gaze of other people, and preferentially imitate the preferences of those most gazed at by others, even when they are alone (Chudek, Heller, Birch, & Henrich, submitted for publication). These data also lend strong support to the idea that others could use gaze following as an indicator of social status within a group: the person who receives the most glances from other group members, or who is gazed at the longest may be perceived as the high status individual (Chance, 1967;Emery, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Converging lines of research show that young children (3-4 year olds) automatically track the gaze of other people, and preferentially imitate the preferences of those most gazed at by others, even when they are alone (Chudek, Heller, Birch, & Henrich, submitted for publication). These data also lend strong support to the idea that others could use gaze following as an indicator of social status within a group: the person who receives the most glances from other group members, or who is gazed at the longest may be perceived as the high status individual (Chance, 1967;Emery, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Ring-tailed lemurs also show spontaneous gaze following of other social group members in their natural environment, suggesting that social attention evolved early in species that interact in social groups (Shepherd & Platt, 2008). Chance (1967) hypothesized that social attention would reflect the dominance hierarchy of primate groups, such that the dominant individual receives the greatest number of glances, and a recent study of patas monkeys supported this prediction (McNelis & Boatright-Horowitz, 1998). It has also been demonstrated that the effectiveness of gaze as a social cue depends on the relative social status of the individual: low status monkeys reflexively follow the gaze of any familiar monkey, but high-status macaques will only respond in this way to other high-status animals (Shepherd, Deaner, & Platt, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting to consider responsiveness to gaze cues as a function of social status in other contexts. While previous research has underlined the importance of the 'attentional structure' of groups (Chance, 1967;Watts, 1998), there may also be some relationship between gaze monitoring and social hierarchy (see Blois-Heulin & Girona, 1999, for patterns and targets of looking relative to rank in a species of Old World monkeys). Lower ranking individuals may gauge the visual orientation of dominants and thus assess the risk of approaching desirable social partners or food items, for example (Hare, Agnetta & Tomasello, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admittedly, the model described in our study cannot claim to be more than a second step-and it is hard to know how many such steps will have to follow. Future elaboration will have to incorporate certain salient facets of social behavior that are neglected in the present model-^for instance, smiling and laughing, the coy response described by Bretherton and Ainsworth (1974), the phenomenon of shame, the systems of sexual and matemal motivation, the readiness to attract as well as to pay attention (Chance 1967). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%