2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention mechanism-based CNN for facial expression recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 5 , our method achieves better performance and shows high results on JAFFE for seven-class. The Attention-based CNN method [ 37 ], which features the highest accuracy of the methods shown in Table 5 , is not as good as ours for the CK+ and Oulu-CASIA. Note that the work [ 32 ] achieved an accuracy of 94.8% for six-class by a new face descriptor, namely, local directional ternary pattern; however, for seven-class, we achieved an 0.18% improvement compared to theirs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 5 , our method achieves better performance and shows high results on JAFFE for seven-class. The Attention-based CNN method [ 37 ], which features the highest accuracy of the methods shown in Table 5 , is not as good as ours for the CK+ and Oulu-CASIA. Note that the work [ 32 ] achieved an accuracy of 94.8% for six-class by a new face descriptor, namely, local directional ternary pattern; however, for seven-class, we achieved an 0.18% improvement compared to theirs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our PAL method achieves the best performance and outperforms the previous best video-based work SAANet [ 43 ] by 9.24%. For the image-based method, Attention-based CNN [ 37 ], our model outperforms it by 2.94%. The confusion matrix in Figure 4 b expresses that happiness expression is very easy to be recognized, while anger and sadness show relatively low performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The product of the extraction process affected the system's output [21]. The traditional algorithms for facial extraction can be divided into two categories: 1) geometric approaches such as Active Appearance Models (AAM); and 2) appearance-based methods like Gabor wavelet representation and Local Binary Pattern (LBP) [34]; in a geometric approach, various geometrical parameters such as position, angle, points of reference, etc. are considered.…”
Section: Facial Expression Recognition (Fer)mentioning
confidence: 99%