2018
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attending globally or locally: Incidental learning of optimal visual attention allocation.

Abstract: Attention allocation determines the information that is encoded into memory. Can participants learn to optimally allocate attention based on what types of information are most likely to change? The current study examined whether participants could incidentally learn that changes to either high spatial frequency (HSF) or low spatial frequency (LSF) Gabor patches were more probable and to use this incidentally learned probability information to bias attention during encoding. Participants detected changes in ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our idea is to ensure that the navigator is always aware of their own position relative to a global landmark. Learning this information not only helps people to develop a cognitive map of the environment, it is also considered to be one of the most significant strategies for the allocation of attention 23 and developing spatial memory 7 , 10 . It therefore serves as a sort of proxy for a compass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our idea is to ensure that the navigator is always aware of their own position relative to a global landmark. Learning this information not only helps people to develop a cognitive map of the environment, it is also considered to be one of the most significant strategies for the allocation of attention 23 and developing spatial memory 7 , 10 . It therefore serves as a sort of proxy for a compass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason for the lower ratings in the low SF condition may be that the coarse information (low SFs) is often processed with global attention strategy (Beck et al, 2018; Shulman & Wilson, 1987). Cuteness is evolutionally associated with protective caregiving behaviors (Kringelbach et al, 2016; Nittono et al, 2012; Sherman et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation is supported by the conclusion that cuteness can improve the performance of tasks (e.g., motor dexterity task and visual search task), which requires focused attention (Nittono et al, 2012; Sherman et al, 2009). Compared with relatively high SFs, low SFs are less appropriate to be processed with a local attention strategy (Beck et al, 2018; Flevaris et al, 2010; Henriksson et al, 2008; Shulman & Wilson, 1987). The global attention strategy may not be helpful for facilitating caregiving behaviors to some extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unbeknownst to the participants, earned points did not affect the number of trials in the experiment. Non-monetary rewards have shown to be effective in guiding human behaviors such as attention ( Beck, Goldstein, van Lamsweerde, & Ericson, 2018 ; Kim & Beck, 2020b ) and decision-making ( Tversky & Kahneman, 1981 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%