Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2019
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2019/25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATSIS: Achieving the Ad hoc Teamwork by Sub-task Inference and Selection

Abstract: In an ad hoc teamwork setting, the team needs to coordinate their activities to perform a task without prior agreement on how to achieve it. The ad hoc agent cannot communicate with its teammates but it can observe their behaviour and plan accordingly. To do so, the existing approaches rely on the teammates' behaviour models. However, the models may not be accurate, which can compromise teamwork. For this reason, we present Ad Hoc Teamwork by Sub-task Inference and Selection (ATSIS) algorithm that uses a sub-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have looked at multi-agent scenarios that do not allow for a full prior coordination or centralized control, but instead require agents to adapt to each other individually and dynamically, and even establish a form of "ad-hoc teamwork" [21][22][23]. This problem of on-the-fly coordination has recently become prominent in collaborative robots and service robots [24] and has been approached mostly for attention and motor-level coordination of physical tasks between humans and robots, e.g., when handing over objects or jointly carrying them [24].…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have looked at multi-agent scenarios that do not allow for a full prior coordination or centralized control, but instead require agents to adapt to each other individually and dynamically, and even establish a form of "ad-hoc teamwork" [21][22][23]. This problem of on-the-fly coordination has recently become prominent in collaborative robots and service robots [24] and has been approached mostly for attention and motor-level coordination of physical tasks between humans and robots, e.g., when handing over objects or jointly carrying them [24].…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (red flags). The domain-specific g can be designed by learning-based offline training (Jaderberg et al 2016;Eysenbach, Salakhutdinov, and Levine 2019) or rule-based online reasoning (Kurzer, Zhou, and Zöllner 2018;Chen et al 2019a;Gabor et al 2019). We design rule-based g for fully-online planning.…”
Section: Subgoal-based Protocol For Coordination Subgoal Predicatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, it is worthy to mention Ad Hoc Teamwork (Stone et al 2010;Chen et al 2019a), where an agent engages in collaborative tasks without relying on communication or pre-defined strategy. However, without communication, it may rely on much offline training instead for understanding teammates, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the second simplification, assuming a fullyobservable action space limits the potential on real-life applications. The researchers develop algorithms to plan the ad hoc agent's action either by using the past teammates' behaviour types (Wu, Zilberstein, and Chen 2011;Albrecht and Ramamoorthy 2013;Barrett et al 2013;Melo and Sardinha 2016;Chandrasekaran et al 2017;Ravula, Alkoby, and Stone 2019) or by inferring the responsibilities new teammates are taking (Chen et al 2019). In both cases, they assume that teammates' actions are fully observable, which is a strong assumption when it comes to more complex domains (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%