2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(03)00107-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial stunning: basics and clinical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
2
116
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 This is thought to occur secondary to atrial stunning; with the resolution of stunning, SEC usually disappears. 19,20 Transesophageal Guided Cardioversion The conventional treatment for patients in atrial fibrillation >48 h who are to undergo cardioversion is pretreatment for 3 weeks with coumadin. This duration of anticoagulant therapy is associated with increased risk of bleeding, continued morbidity from AF, continued (though decreased) risk of embolism, additional cost for medicines and monitoring for level of anticoagulation, scheduling difficulties, delay of cardioversion, and increased refusal of patients to undergo cardioversion.…”
Section: Treatment Of Spontaneous Echo Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 This is thought to occur secondary to atrial stunning; with the resolution of stunning, SEC usually disappears. 19,20 Transesophageal Guided Cardioversion The conventional treatment for patients in atrial fibrillation >48 h who are to undergo cardioversion is pretreatment for 3 weeks with coumadin. This duration of anticoagulant therapy is associated with increased risk of bleeding, continued morbidity from AF, continued (though decreased) risk of embolism, additional cost for medicines and monitoring for level of anticoagulation, scheduling difficulties, delay of cardioversion, and increased refusal of patients to undergo cardioversion.…”
Section: Treatment Of Spontaneous Echo Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] In addition to AF duration and the left atrial dimension, the left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanical function has been suggested as an important factor for successful CV of AF and the maintenance of SR. [15][16][17][18][19][20] After electrical CV, atrial mechanical stunning develops, which presents as diminished LAA flow velocities. 18,21 This atrial stunning can be reversed by isoproterenol infusion. 22,23 The LAA is a distinct structure from the left atrium proper, although it lies adjacent to the left atrium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ablation is done epicardially, the transmurality of the lesion might lead to damage on the endocardial surface and a greater risk of thrombus development in the LA. Furthermore, since the majority of patients suffer from persistent or long-standing persistent AF (e.g., in the de Asmundis report, 92% of patients were in AF at the beginning of the surgery) (1), and thus most of them are cardioverted to sinus rhythm during ablation (either by the ablation itself or by direct current cardioversion), the resulting left atrial stunning (which is recognized as pro-thrombus) could contribute to thrombus formation (12). Lastly, in most studies, no anticoagulation was given during the thoracoscopic ablation (or at least no heparin was reported given).…”
Section: Safety Of Hybrid Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%