BACKGROUNDThis case presents a novel aetiology of a common arrhythmia. Although rare, there is no current consensus on the optimal management of electrical shock-induced atrial fi brillation.
CASE PRESENTATIONA previously well 40-year-old man presented to the emergency department after suffering an 11 000 volt DC electrical shock from overhead power lines through a portable crane which he was manipulating from the ground. He had initially been unable to remove his right hand, the entry point, from the controller as it had experienced tetanic contraction. After approximately 5 s he was thrown backwards onto turf. He denied loss of consciousness, head injury, shortness of breath or chest pain, but admitted to lethargy, a dull generalised headache and occasional palpitations. Paramedics had initially noted an irregular tachycardia.On examination, he was of athletic build and comfortable at rest. His right hand was generally mildly tender but was normal to inspection. His left great toe, the exit point, had a small blister on the lateral aspect which was painful to touch. There was no evidence of internal burns or compartment syndrome in the limbs or thorax. There were no signs of haemodynamic compromise. His pulse was irregularly irregular at a rate of 80 beats per min. His blood pressure was stable at 120/80 mm Hg.
INVESTIGATIONSFull blood count, urea and electrolytes, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time, creatine kinase, troponin T and thyroid function tests were all within normal ranges. Chest radiography was normal. A targeted echocardiographic study demonstrated normal left ventricular systolic function. Electrocardiography undertaken before a routine minor surgical procedure 3 years previously had demonstrated sinus rhythm ( fi gure 1 ). His ECG on this occasion showed atrial fi brillation with a controlled ventricular rate ( fi gure 2 ).
TREATMENTThe patient was transferred to the coronary care unit for cardiac monitoring. He was given a therapeutic dose of enoxaparin and simple analgesia. A 150 mg bolus of fl ecainide over 10 min, given 4 h after the initial injury, failed to restore sinus rhythm. An amiodarone infusion (300 mg over 1 h followed by a further 900 mg over 23 h), started 11 h after the initial injury, restored sinus rhythm 24 h after the initial injury. DC cardioversion had been intended had the amiodarone infusion failed to work.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UPThe patient's palpitations ceased on restoration of sinus rhythm. He was discharged home the same day. Follow-up in 1 month with a transthoracic echocardiograph was arranged.
DISCUSSIONAtrial fi brillation is by far the most common persistent cardiac arrhythmia, with approximately 1-2 per cent of adults being affected at any one time. Incidence increases with age, with 9 per cent of those aged 80 or over being affected. 1 Other main risk factors for the development of atrial fi brilllation include hypertension and valve disease; less common causes include thyroid dysfunction, alcohol abuse and malignancy. 2 Electrocution as...