2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10529-020-02989-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATP dynamic regeneration strategy for enhancing co-production of glutathione and S-adenosylmethionine in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…coli. Similar results, stable intracellular ATP level through the fermentation and improved GSH (137.40%) and SAM (82.18%) coproduction, were achieved …”
Section: Genetic Circuits For Sensing and Dynamic Regulation Of Intra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…coli. Similar results, stable intracellular ATP level through the fermentation and improved GSH (137.40%) and SAM (82.18%) coproduction, were achieved …”
Section: Genetic Circuits For Sensing and Dynamic Regulation Of Intra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…131 Artificial genetic circuits based on the ATP-sensing riboswitch ydaO motif were developed to control vhb and ptxD expression. Dynamic regulation of intracellular ATP pool to appropriate level improved SAM production by 55% 131 and 82.18%, 129 respectively, in different studies. The genetic circuits will be discussed in section 5.2.…”
Section: Cofactor Sam Atp and Nad(p)h Regeneration And Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ATP provides energy for the biosynthesis of a large number of biological compounds, such as amino acids, proteins, and lipids [ 6 ]. Large amounts of ATP are also needed in another important field that is cell-free protein expression, as they are involved in complex reaction cascades [ 1 , 7 , 8 ], such as the production of S-adenosyl-homocysteine (SAH), glutathione (GSH), and S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a quicker, less energy-efficient source of ATP, and it does not require the FoF1 ATP synthase driven by proton motive forces (PMF) across the membranes compared with oxidative phosphorylation and photophosphorylation to regenerate ATP [ 5 , 11 ]. At the same time, there are other types of ATP regeneration, such as co-production of glutathione and S-adenosyl-methionine [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%