2021
DOI: 10.1590/dados.2021.64.1.230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atores, Eventos e Redes da Política Externa Brasileira (1930-1985)

Abstract: RESUMO Este artigo apresenta a utilidade da análise de redes para compreender os atores e as arenas da política externa brasileira, no período de 1930 a 1985. Para esse fim, utiliza uma base de dados inédita com 953 eventos que somam 3.731 participantes. O estudo argumenta que a política externa brasileira foi moldada por ampla gama de atores e instituições. De um lado, o Ministério das Relações Exteriores não teve o monopólio da arena. De outro, apesar de serem minoria, os diplomatas foram os atores centrais … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of network density that is understood as the set of actors' connections. And the centralities, which are properties of the most used networks, which make the characteristics relevant to the relevance or visibility of a given actor emerge in a collaboration network (Williams dos Santos & Farias Filho, 2016;Allegretti, Moysés, Werneck, Quandt & Moysés, 2018;Farias & Carmo, 2021;Severiano Junior, Cunha, Zouain & Gonçalves, 2021;Ribeiro, 2022).…”
Section: Methodological Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of network density that is understood as the set of actors' connections. And the centralities, which are properties of the most used networks, which make the characteristics relevant to the relevance or visibility of a given actor emerge in a collaboration network (Williams dos Santos & Farias Filho, 2016;Allegretti, Moysés, Werneck, Quandt & Moysés, 2018;Farias & Carmo, 2021;Severiano Junior, Cunha, Zouain & Gonçalves, 2021;Ribeiro, 2022).…”
Section: Methodological Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%