2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.02.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic examinations of the solid-phase epitaxial growth of silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluctuation of the growth rate was also observed by Gillespie and Wadley. 5) The fluctuation of N = 6144 is smaller than that of N = 11200. This is because the system size is too small to include large defects at the a=c interface.…”
Section: Size Effects On Spe Processesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fluctuation of the growth rate was also observed by Gillespie and Wadley. 5) The fluctuation of N = 6144 is smaller than that of N = 11200. This is because the system size is too small to include large defects at the a=c interface.…”
Section: Size Effects On Spe Processesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The simulation time for annealing at 1400 K is 1000 ns, which is much larger than that performed by others. [2][3][4][5][6]8,9) It is apparent that the volume of the crystal region increases with annealing temperature and time. Although the a=c interface was flat initially, it became rough with the progress of SPE.…”
Section: Growth Processes and Activation Energy Of Spe Recrystallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a powerful approach for investigating the crystal growth mechanism, because it gives us atomic-scale information. Many studies on crystal growth simulation for semiconductors using the MD method have been reported [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krzeminski et al 25) examined crystallization of amorphous by MD simulations using the Tersoff potential, the Stillinger-Weber potential, the Lenosky-modified embedded atom potential, and the environment-dependent interatomic potential. Gillespie and Wadley 26) performed a similar study using the bond order potential. As a result, it was found that the Tersoff potential is most closely matched with the experimental activation energy of crystallization rate (the activation energy is summarized in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%