2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.2991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic structure of carbon nanotubes from scanning tunneling microscopy

Abstract: The atomic structure of a carbon nanotube can be described by its chiral angle and diameter and can be specified by a pair of lattice indices (n,m). The electronic and mechanical properties are critically dependent on these indices. Scanning tunneling microscopy ͑STM͒ is a useful tool to investigate carbon nanotubes since the atomic structure as well as the electronic properties of individual molecules can be determined. This paper presents a discussion of the technique to obtain (n,m) indices of nanotubes fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
138
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometry of the tip apex results in convolution effects, producing an apparent broadening of the nanotube, whereas the circular shape of the tube, combined with the tendency of the tunneling current to follow the shortest path, induces distortions in the STM image of the nanotube lattice, making it to appear stretched in the direction perpendicular to the tube. [18][19][20] Generally, for an accurate diameter determination, models for deconvoluting the tip contribution are employed, 21 which might not yield a very precise determination in the present case due to the noncircular shape of the nanotube and to the unknown geometry of the STM tip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geometry of the tip apex results in convolution effects, producing an apparent broadening of the nanotube, whereas the circular shape of the tube, combined with the tendency of the tunneling current to follow the shortest path, induces distortions in the STM image of the nanotube lattice, making it to appear stretched in the direction perpendicular to the tube. [18][19][20] Generally, for an accurate diameter determination, models for deconvoluting the tip contribution are employed, 21 which might not yield a very precise determination in the present case due to the noncircular shape of the nanotube and to the unknown geometry of the STM tip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…␥ 0 is the value of the nearest neighbor overlap integral, ranging from 2.4 to 2.9 eV. 19,26,27 The range of diameters so obtained for the currently investigated nanotube is from 2.5 to 3 nm for a 0.8 eV separation, assuming that the positions of the Van Hove singularities are not affected by the radial deformation.…”
Section: Fig 3 ͑Color Online͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chiral indexes ͑n , m͒ of the investigated SWNTs were determined from the measurements of the chiral angle and an estimation of the SWNT band-gap energy from STS spectra 43 compared with the one derived from tight-binding calculations taking into account the curvature effects. 44 For the SWNTs discussed in Secs.…”
Section: B Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STM image shows an array of closely packed bright dots, being consistent with earlier reports. 32 When 4AT tips (Fig. 12(c)), instead of conventional metal tips, were used, we observed protrusions brighter than the perfectly aligned carbon atoms (Fig.…”
Section: Visualization Of Atomic Defects In Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 83%