1985
DOI: 10.1063/1.335254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic structure model for Ga1−xInxAs solid solution

Abstract: A simple atomic structure model was proposed for Ga1−xInxAs solid solution. Distortion energy caused by the differences in Ga-As and In-As bond lengths was calculated using the valence-force-field approach. Calculated bond lengths for Ga1−xInxAs agree well with the extended x-ray absorption fine structure data. The calculated mixing enthalpy which corresponds to the excess energy caused by distortions agree with that from phase diagram.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, for the case of Mo (1– x ) W x S 2 , the total bond length is unchanged as the lattice parameter follows the Vegrad’s law, 42 such that ∑Δ d ij = 0, whereas , where Δ d W–S and Δ d Mo–S are the variations of W–S and Mo–S bond lengths. 4345 However, the variation of bond length in the alloys would lead to the distortion energy. Moreover, the distortion energy can be related with the composition in the intralayer, that is, U dis = Ω· x (1 – x ), where Ω is the constant.…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, for the case of Mo (1– x ) W x S 2 , the total bond length is unchanged as the lattice parameter follows the Vegrad’s law, 42 such that ∑Δ d ij = 0, whereas , where Δ d W–S and Δ d Mo–S are the variations of W–S and Mo–S bond lengths. 4345 However, the variation of bond length in the alloys would lead to the distortion energy. Moreover, the distortion energy can be related with the composition in the intralayer, that is, U dis = Ω· x (1 – x ), where Ω is the constant.…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, for the case of Mo (1– x ) W x S 2 , the total bond length is unchanged as the lattice parameter follows the Vegrad’s law, such that ∑Δ d ij = 0, whereas , where Δ d W–S and Δ d Mo–S are the variations of W–S and Mo–S bond lengths. However, the variation of bond length in the alloys would lead to the distortion energy. Moreover, the distortion energy can be related with the composition in the intralayer, that is, U dis = Ω· x (1 – x ), where Ω is the constant. In addition, the interlayer interaction in Mo (1– x ) W x S 2 contains the Coulomb electrostatic energy, U coul , short-range exchange repulsive potential, U rep , and dipole–dipole vdW dispersive interactions, U vdW ( t denotes the interlayer distance of S–S).…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%