Filippov, Vanossi, and Urbakh Reply: We thank McLaughlin, Rabson, and Thiel [1] for their interest in our original work [2] and for their attentive reading.Based on a 2D generalized Prandtl-Tomlinson model, the main conclusion of our Letter [2] is ''that the difference between the length scales of potential corrugation in the periodic and aperiodic directions is the main source of the observed anisotropy of friction on the Al-Ni-Co quasicrystal surface.'' The Prandtl-Tomlinson model demonstrates that the friction force along a given direction is mainly defined by the maximal gradient of the potential in that direction, which is dictated, besides the amplitudes of the substrate potential, by the length scales of potential corrugation. The length scales of potential corrugation depend, in turn, in a correlated way, on both lattice periodicity of the substrate and on the widths of the Gaussian functions used to mimic the potential. We do certainly agree with McLaughlin, Rabson, and Thiel that both these interrelated features are important, and their careful analysis highlights this issue.Notwithstanding the theoretical interest of this ''parametric'' study, we did not play systematically in our work