2000
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.39.l113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Resolution Imaging on Si(100)2×1 and Si(100)2×1:H Surfaces with Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy

Abstract: We investigate the difference in atomic resolution images between the Si(100)2×1 reconstructed surface with a dangling bond and the Si(100)2×1:H monohydride surface without a dangling bond using noncontact atomic force microscopy. On the Si(100)2×1 surface, the distance between bright spots is 3.2 ±0.1 Å, which is larger than that between silicon atoms. On the Si(100)2×1:H surface, the distance between bright spots is 3.5 ±0.1 Å, which is in good agreement with that between hydrogen atoms. For the first time, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tilted dangling bond indeed explains the deviation observed in our AFM images from the core atomic position of the surface. Similar observations were reported in AFM imaging of the dimer structure on the Si001-2 1 surface [22], and qualitatively supported by theoretical AFM simulations [23]. In our experiments we noticed some variation in the lateral positions depending on imaging conditions [i.e., Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The tilted dangling bond indeed explains the deviation observed in our AFM images from the core atomic position of the surface. Similar observations were reported in AFM imaging of the dimer structure on the Si001-2 1 surface [22], and qualitatively supported by theoretical AFM simulations [23]. In our experiments we noticed some variation in the lateral positions depending on imaging conditions [i.e., Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The models that we adopt for infinite-size (100) platelets are the (100) hydrogenated internal surfaces. External (100) surfaces have been widely studied experimentally [18][19][20][21][22], and a number of theoretical studies exist [23,24]. The principal structures of the (100) hydrogenated internal surfaces are the 1x1 reconstruction and the 2x1 reconstruction of the surface.…”
Section: Model: Hydrogenated Si(100) Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start calculations with an initial unreconstructed surface structure having two dangling bonds for each atom on the surface. We provide a direct comparison of our results with experimental measurements obtained by different methods including X-Ray diffraction [41], low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) [42] and also AFM [16]. In addition we compare with theoretical results obtained by Refs.…”
Section: A Si(100)2×1 Reconstructed Surfacementioning
confidence: 69%