1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(99)00127-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic force microscopy observations of debonding in 304 L stainless steel thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They studied both C-lean and C-alloyed films. However, other works pointed out impaired susceptibility to film cracking and delamination of SS films when exposed to contact loads [26][27][28] . Talea et al 26 and Colin et al 27 reported debonding induced by compressive loads in 304L stainless steel films deposited onto polycarbonate substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They studied both C-lean and C-alloyed films. However, other works pointed out impaired susceptibility to film cracking and delamination of SS films when exposed to contact loads [26][27][28] . Talea et al 26 and Colin et al 27 reported debonding induced by compressive loads in 304L stainless steel films deposited onto polycarbonate substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, other works pointed out impaired susceptibility to film cracking and delamination of SS films when exposed to contact loads [26][27][28] . Talea et al 26 and Colin et al 27 reported debonding induced by compressive loads in 304L stainless steel films deposited onto polycarbonate substrates. Eymery and Boubeker studied film-to-substrate adherence for SS films sputtered from 304L targets onto a wide variety of substrates 28 , pointing out impaired film capacity to bear contact and scratch loads 28 and emphasizing the role of high compressive stresses observed in the films on the impaired film adherence 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The stress magnitude is often very high (larger than the elastic limit of the same material in the bulk state) and thus spontaneous delamination phenomenon such as buckling (2D) or wrinkling (1D) may appear for a critical film thickness (relaxation of the stored elastic energy) when extracting the sample out side the deposition chamber [1][2][3][4]. Although a lot of theoretical works have been done [5] to develop mechanical models and calculations (elasticity of thin plates, fracture mechanic, finite element, analytical calculation) with the aim to get a better understanding of driven mechanisms giving rise to this phenomenon, only a few experimental works [1][2] have been done on this subject to support these theoretical results and nothing concerning local stress/strain measurement mainly because of the small dimension of the buckling (few tenth µm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress magnitude is often very high (larger than the elastic limit of the same material in the bulk state) and thus spontaneous delamination phenomenon such as 1D -wrinkling (see figure 1) or 2D -buckling (figure 2) may appear for a critical film thickness (relaxation of the stored elastic energy) when extracting the sample out side the deposition chamber [1][2][3][4]. Although a lot of theoretical works have been done [5] to develop mechanical models and calculations (elasticity of thin plates, fracture mechanic, finite element and analytical calculations) with the aim to get a better understanding of driven mechanisms giving rise to this phenomenon, only a few experimental work [1][2] has been done on this subject to support these theoretical results and nothing concerning local stress/strain measurement mainly because of the small dimension of the buckling (few tenth µm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%