1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00906-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic arrangements in Ni7 and Ni8 clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
30
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall therefore compare our calculated structural properties for nickel clusters with N = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 13 with those of accurate electronic-structure calculations using different density-functional methods. 15,16,17,18,19 Table I Table I that our results agree well with those of the other studies, both concerning the structure itself and concerning the interatomic distances. Most of the discrepancies are related to smaller distortions that may be due to electronic effects (e.g., Jahn-Teller distortions) that are not included in the EAM method.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We shall therefore compare our calculated structural properties for nickel clusters with N = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 13 with those of accurate electronic-structure calculations using different density-functional methods. 15,16,17,18,19 Table I Table I that our results agree well with those of the other studies, both concerning the structure itself and concerning the interatomic distances. Most of the discrepancies are related to smaller distortions that may be due to electronic effects (e.g., Jahn-Teller distortions) that are not included in the EAM method.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…[16] and N = 7, Ref. [17]) we compare with the second-lowest structure, and in another (N = 4, Ref. [19]) we give their results for the two energetically close minima.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This GGA result is inconsistent with all other studies. It seems that the LSDA calculations of Desmarais et al 6 have the best agreement with both experimental and semiempirical studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This statement is particularly true when dealing with nanometric clusters, where the geometry and multiplicity of the structure calculated as most stable, for a given cluster size, still remains dependent on the calculation procedure. 7, [19][20][21][22] Even within a given methodology, different basis sets in an ab initio or density functional calculation result in different geometries for a given cluster size, and the associated electronic descriptions will not be, thence, even comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22,25,26 A high-spin ground state has been found for a 13-atom Ni cluster, 22 but the M of larger systems has not been yet evaluated. DFT calculations ignore, however, spin contamination, and the effect that it has on the results is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%