2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0543-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Science with InSight

Abstract: In November 2018, for the first time a dedicated geophysical station, the InSight lander, will be deployed on the surface of Mars. Along with the two main geophysical pack-The InSight Mission to Mars II Edited by William B. Banerdt and Christopher T. Russell B A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
162
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
14
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Renno et al (2004) noticed a similar periodicity in ground heat flux measurements during a dust devil survey in Arizona but attributed it to a kind of dust‐convection feedback where lofted dust reduces the solar input on the ground, resulting in less dust lifting, and so on. However, little other evidence for such a feedback exists, and since regularity in the Martian PBL has already been noted in the spacing of dust devils (Fenton & Lorenz, 2015), and the cellular structure of the PBL is evident in large‐eddy simulations (e.g., Spiga et al, 2018), this is our preferred explanation. With a cellular pattern with a characteristic wavelength of the order of the PBL thickness (2–10 km) and advection speeds of the order of 5–10 m/s, quasiperiodic variations in other meteorological properties with periods of a few hundred seconds might be expected and indeed have been observed in the Viking windspeed and seismometer record (Lorenz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Short‐term Solar Flux Variationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Renno et al (2004) noticed a similar periodicity in ground heat flux measurements during a dust devil survey in Arizona but attributed it to a kind of dust‐convection feedback where lofted dust reduces the solar input on the ground, resulting in less dust lifting, and so on. However, little other evidence for such a feedback exists, and since regularity in the Martian PBL has already been noted in the spacing of dust devils (Fenton & Lorenz, 2015), and the cellular structure of the PBL is evident in large‐eddy simulations (e.g., Spiga et al, 2018), this is our preferred explanation. With a cellular pattern with a characteristic wavelength of the order of the PBL thickness (2–10 km) and advection speeds of the order of 5–10 m/s, quasiperiodic variations in other meteorological properties with periods of a few hundred seconds might be expected and indeed have been observed in the Viking windspeed and seismometer record (Lorenz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Short‐term Solar Flux Variationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Indeed, such clouds have been visible in camera images acquired in sunset and postsunset imaging campaigns after Sol 140—Figure 12 shows one example. In their discussion of prelanding meteorological expectations, Spiga et al (2018) noted that InSight is at low enough latitude to be in the Mars aphelion cloud belt, and orbital observations cited there support the expectation of visible clouds forming from about L s = 0° (InSight Sol 117) and increasing up to northern summer solstice ( L s = 90°, InSight Sol 320).…”
Section: Twilightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In situ radiometers can also be used to derive thermophysical properties of the observed ground, such as thermal inertia (e.g., Fergason et al, ; Golombek et al, ; Grott et al, ; Vasavada et al, ). The InSight lander also has a comprehensive suite of meteorological sensors, which enable atmospheric science that is enhanced by the RAD data (Banfield et al, ; Spiga et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%