2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10453-012-9246-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric pollen dynamics in Münster, north-western Germany: a three-year study (2004–2006)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pollen calendars from different regions of Europe indicate that Salix pollen represents varied percentage participation. For instance, it was estimated at 1.12% in Germany (Münster) [43], 1.36% in Slovakia (Bratislava) [44], and 1.10% in Sweden (Stockholm) [45]. These values are similar to those recorded in this study in Lublin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Pollen calendars from different regions of Europe indicate that Salix pollen represents varied percentage participation. For instance, it was estimated at 1.12% in Germany (Münster) [43], 1.36% in Slovakia (Bratislava) [44], and 1.10% in Sweden (Stockholm) [45]. These values are similar to those recorded in this study in Lublin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The continuous presence of the Juglans pollen in the air during the flowering season and the magnitude of airborne concentrations confirm that there are notable sources of Juglans pollen in the study region. Annual catches of Juglans pollen are higher than those recorded in more northwestern parts of Europe (Melgar et al , ) but are similar to those measured in other Central European areas (Fehér & Jarai‐Komlodi, ; Ščevková et al , ; Ianovici et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Juglans pollen is registered in airborne pollen samples in many parts of the world (Fehér & Jarai‐Komlodi, ; Lorenzoni et al , ; Kobzar, ; Murray et al , ; Ščevková et al , ; Çeter et al , ; Melgar et al , ; Xu et al , ; Ianovici et al , ). However, the use of aerobiological data in modelling seasonal variations in walnut yield has, to date, only been suggested in the literature (Fernandez‐Mensaque et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the Hirst trap is that it provides a daily or bihourly record of fungal spore concentrations that may be used to construct actual calendars of bioaerosols (e.g. Ceter et al, 2012;Melgar et al, 2012;Skjøth and Sommer, 2010). The disadvantage of the Hirst trap is that the associated method for counting of the spores in microscopes only provides observations of fungal spores at the genus level (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%