2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmosphere-driven ice sheet mass loss paced by topography: Insights from modelling the south-western Scandinavian Ice Sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this ice‐sheet geometry, the revised deglacial chronology supports recent modelling suggesting that air temperature (i.e. surface melt) was the dominant factor driving widespread, millennial‐scale ice sheet mass loss during deglaciation in south‐west Norway (Åkesson et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given this ice‐sheet geometry, the revised deglacial chronology supports recent modelling suggesting that air temperature (i.e. surface melt) was the dominant factor driving widespread, millennial‐scale ice sheet mass loss during deglaciation in south‐west Norway (Åkesson et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such deposits are critical, however, for improving knowledge of the timing of glacier readvances (i.e. maximum-limiting ages), for better understanding local palaeoclimatic trends, and for identifying asynchronous vs. synchronous behaviour of ice margins during deglaciation (Andersen et al, 1995;Briner et al, 2014;Åkesson et al, 2018). These gaps in knowledge due to missing or obscured geological archives are highlighted by recent compilations of ice age palaeogeography in Scandinavia Stroeven et al, 2016), which have relatively few constraints for Bølling-Allerød ice sheet margins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand why high upstream velocities are not reproduced in models, one must look into how the ice stream is initiated. The origin of NEGIS has been explained by a geothermal heat flux (GHF) anomaly left behind by the passage of the Icelandic plume (Fahnestock et al, 2001;Rogozhina et al, 2016;Martos et al, 2018;Alley et al, 2019). Interpretation of radar data points to unusually high basal melt rates at the head of the ice stream, corresponding to an exceptionally high GHF of 970 mW m −2 (Fahnestock et al, 2001;Macgregor et al, 2016;Alley et al, 2019;Keisling et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These large uncertainties in the estimates of the GHF have been shown to dominate the uncertainty on the ice flux in this region (Smith-Johnsen et al, 2019). In addition, the GHF maps are coarse and may not capture local anomalies like the one suggested to exist at the head of NEGIS (Fahnestock et al, 2001;Macgregor et al, 2016;Alley et al, 2019). Accurately capturing such a feature and explicitly representing the effect of high melt rates on basal sliding are key to reproduce the distinct velocity pattern of NEGIS in ice sheet models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the cryosphere community continues to make strides in understanding processes that govern variability of the present-day ice sheets, geologic proxies constraining past ice sheet change provide important clues as to how ice sheets may have responded to past climate change (Alley et al, 2010). Decades of research have led to the development of high-resolution geologic reconstructions that detail the spatial pattern and rate of retreat of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) over the last deglaciation as it evolved towards its present-day geometry (Weidick, 1968;Bennike and Bjorck, 2002;Young and Briner, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%