2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782014000600028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmosfera modificada e refrigeração para conservação pós-colheita de camu-camu

Abstract: RESUMO O presente trabalho tem por objetivo avaliar a conservação pós-colheita de camu-camu, utilizando a refrigeração e a atmosfera modifi cada propiciada pelos fi lmes de policloreto de vinila (PVC) e polipropileno biaxialmente orientado de

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the report by Cia et al (2010) in the present study, the concentrations of O 2 and CO 2 varied significantly in both cases over the entire storage period under both refrigerated and ambient conditions (Table 4). This variation did not have deleterious action on the fruits, it showed that both packages were permeable to these gases, which allowed gas exchanges with the environment, avoiding the occurrence of physiological imbalances that could have a negative effect on the quality of the fruits during the 14 days of storage (Oliveira et al, 2014;Rinaldi et al, 2017b). As for the phytosanitary evaluation, fruits kept at 10 °C did not show symptoms of infestation by any post-harvest pathogens during the 14 days of storage (Benato et al, 2002;Junqueira et al, 2003;Muniz et al, 2003;Arruda et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike the report by Cia et al (2010) in the present study, the concentrations of O 2 and CO 2 varied significantly in both cases over the entire storage period under both refrigerated and ambient conditions (Table 4). This variation did not have deleterious action on the fruits, it showed that both packages were permeable to these gases, which allowed gas exchanges with the environment, avoiding the occurrence of physiological imbalances that could have a negative effect on the quality of the fruits during the 14 days of storage (Oliveira et al, 2014;Rinaldi et al, 2017b). As for the phytosanitary evaluation, fruits kept at 10 °C did not show symptoms of infestation by any post-harvest pathogens during the 14 days of storage (Benato et al, 2002;Junqueira et al, 2003;Muniz et al, 2003;Arruda et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this case, the association between PP packaging and the temperature of 6 °C presented the lowest average (4.11), which may favor the inhibition and development of microorganisms responsible for food deterioration, causing an increase in the preservation period (Oliveira et al, 2010). During storage, a decrease in pH was expected for all treatments, which would be associated with the accumulation of sugars (SS) and organic acids during fruit ripening (Nascimento Junior et al, 2008;Oshiro et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2014;Siqueira at al., 2017). However, The hue angle showed significance only in the interactions between packaging x temperature and packaging x storage time (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Soares et al (2011) found that for titratable acidity values, there was no significant influence on the type of packaging or storage time. The oscillation in titratable acidity during storage may be related to the biochemical processes of respiratory metabolism, which both synthesizes and consumes organic acids (Oliveira et al, 2014), besides the genetic variability of the fruits analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%