1971
DOI: 10.3102/00346543041002143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atkinson’s Theory of Achievement Motivation: First Step Toward a Theory of Academic Motivation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
58
1
9

Year Published

1972
1972
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(57 reference statements)
9
58
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Atkinson's (1964) achievement motivation theory, tendencies to approach success and to avoid failure are two conventional motive dispositions (Maehr & Sjogren, 1971). Since the late 1970s, achievement goal theory had been developed and "goal" had been identified as a central variable in recent studies on achievement motivation (Attenweiler & Moore, 2006;Elliot & Harackiewicz, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on Atkinson's (1964) achievement motivation theory, tendencies to approach success and to avoid failure are two conventional motive dispositions (Maehr & Sjogren, 1971). Since the late 1970s, achievement goal theory had been developed and "goal" had been identified as a central variable in recent studies on achievement motivation (Attenweiler & Moore, 2006;Elliot & Harackiewicz, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Atkinson (1964), tendency to approach success is manifested by engaging in achievement-oriented activities while tendency to avoid failure is manifested by escaping from the situations (Maehr & Sjogren, 1971). These dimensions could be well measured by the Achievement Motives Scale (AMS; Gjesme & Nygard, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the first experiment, the design allowed for a consideration of the effects of I-eval and E-eval conditions in the case of easy and hard tasks. Additionally, Experiment II introduced two new independent variables, sex and need achievement (nAch) (Atkinson & Feather, 1966;McClelland, Atkinson, Clark, & Lowell 1953; see also Maehr & Sjogren 1971). These two other independent variables could not be used simultaneously in a four-way design because the measure of nAch chosen for this study (Mehrabian 1958) requires a different form of the instrument for males and females.…”
Section: Experiments IImentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The need for a separate psychology of motivation for the two sexes has been cogently argued by McClelland (1966) and by others (Maehr and Sjogren, 1971). …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%