2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are achievement motivation and thinking styles related? A visit among Chinese university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
17
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The standardized parameter estimates are presented in Table 4. These findings are comparable with those identified by Fan and Zhang (2009).…”
Section: Reliabilities and Validities Of The Thinking Styles Inventorsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standardized parameter estimates are presented in Table 4. These findings are comparable with those identified by Fan and Zhang (2009).…”
Section: Reliabilities and Validities Of The Thinking Styles Inventorsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Empirical evidence from both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the three-factor structure of thinking styles across various hearing populations in both Western and Eastern contexts (e.g., Fan & Zhang, 2009;Zhang, 2008). Furthermore, the structure has been largely supported (using EFA) among DHH students (Cheng & Zhang, 2014).…”
Section: The Theoretical Framework Of Thinking Styles and Their Researchmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These results, compared to earlier findings, are partially consistent with those reported by Fan and Zhang (2009 positive contributions of hierarchic and liberal Type I styles to mastery goal orientation indicate that participants who tended to use more creativity and higher levels of cognitive complexity generating thinking styles also tended to be more confident and inclined to acquire knowledge to learn and increase their competence for self development. This result is consistent with the theoretical conceptualization done by Sternberg and Lubart (1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the literature, each of these constructs and their relationships with academic achievement have been examined extensively. However, the relationships between the two constructs and the predictive power of them on academic achievement have not been investigated yet, except the study of Fan and Zhang (2009). On the other hand, researchers and educators need to understand and explain the quality of the students' performances by the nature of the relations of various theories addressing the learning behavior.…”
Section: S Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Hypothesis 1 : People with Type I styles may be inclined to actively act on their environments and perform creative behaviors. Therefore, individuals with Type I styles will positively explore self and environmental career features, and their CDMD in the LR and LI domains may be decreased. Hypothesis 2 : People with Type II styles may prefer conservative thinking and avoid risk‐taking behaviors (Fan & Zhang, ); thus, they may not like to explore self and environmental career features and may have more CDMD in the LR and LI domains. Hypothesis 3 : Both self‐ and environment career exploration will significantly mediate the influences of thinking styles on the LR and LI domains.
…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%