2019 International Symposium on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISEE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isee2.2019.8921032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asynchronous 2-Phase Level-Encoded Convention Logic (LCL)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NCL utilizes multi-rail logic, most commonly the dual-rail logic, to eliminate timing references, and a 4-phased handshaking-protocol for synchronization and control. A 2phase protocol could also serve as an alternative handshaking scheme [16]. Unlike Boolean logic, dual-rail encoding requires two wires per variable to represent one bit of information (i.e., logic '0' or '1'), thus simultaneously representing both literals of the variable.…”
Section: Ncl Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCL utilizes multi-rail logic, most commonly the dual-rail logic, to eliminate timing references, and a 4-phased handshaking-protocol for synchronization and control. A 2phase protocol could also serve as an alternative handshaking scheme [16]. Unlike Boolean logic, dual-rail encoding requires two wires per variable to represent one bit of information (i.e., logic '0' or '1'), thus simultaneously representing both literals of the variable.…”
Section: Ncl Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asynchronous NOCs based on 2-phase LEDR is projected as an efficient solution as it provides better performance compared to 4 phase encoding in terms of power and throughput, but 2-phase signal handling needs complex design [2]. In this paper, we are proposing simple yet efficient LEDR encoder and decoder circuits.…”
Section: Proposed Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Though asynchronous designs proved efficient over synchronous counterparts in terms of scalability, power consumption, and better timing constraints. But they have some severe drawbacks when area and speed are considered due to complex handshake control circuits which increase the static power loss [2]. In this study, we offer a proposal for a highspeed, low-power small NOC architecture based on LEDR encoding and a lightweight router…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing work aims to develop backend flows to support different QDI templates, e.g. SDDS-Velo [12], LCL [13] and others. Another limitation of Pulsar is its lack of formal verification, relying mostly in post-synthesis simulation for validation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Ongoing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%