2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetrical stabilization and mobilization exploited during static single leg stance and goal directed kicking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the percentages of right-and left-footed participants in the current study is comparable to the percentages of right-and left-handedness reported for the world population [70,71]. Nevertheless, the number of volunteers of the current work (26 physically active young adults who reported no neuromuscular problems) was higher than the standard number of participants (10-22 participants) recruited in previous studies [8,[16][17][18]. Furthermore, in the current study, we applied more rigorous statistical corrections for family-wise alpha-error accumulation.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the percentages of right-and left-footed participants in the current study is comparable to the percentages of right-and left-handedness reported for the world population [70,71]. Nevertheless, the number of volunteers of the current work (26 physically active young adults who reported no neuromuscular problems) was higher than the standard number of participants (10-22 participants) recruited in previous studies [8,[16][17][18]. Furthermore, in the current study, we applied more rigorous statistical corrections for family-wise alpha-error accumulation.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Traditionally, studies on footedness analyzed unipedal postural stability by assessing the center of pressure (COP) oscillations; however, the COP-based variables, such as sway area [16], COP excursion [17], 95% COP elliptical area [18], standard deviation [18], total path length [16,18], and speed [8,18], did not indicate an effect of leg dominance. Only in a body-tracking test [19] were effects of footedness observed when participants received visual feedback of their performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gstöttner et al (2009) suggested that the postural difference between the dominant and non-dominant leg could be more obvious in a test that is more difficult/demanding for the locomotor system. In any case, potential postural differences between the dominant and non-dominant leg would be more likely to occur in dynamic than in static conditions (King and Wang, 2017;Promsri et al, 2018) especially in athletes who practice a dynamic sport such as soccer (Jadczak et al, 2019). When no distinction can be made between the dominant leg and the non-dominant leg through classic analyses of spatiotemporal parameters of centre of foot pressure displacements, one could refine the methods of analysis in order to observe this possible distinction.…”
Section: Influencing Factors Related To Environmental and Experimenta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Da die Händigkeit [63] und die Füßigkeit in der Bevölkerung überwiegend rechtsbetont sind, wird für Gleichgewichtsaufgaben vorrangig das nichtdominante Bein, beim Großteil der Bevölkerung also das linke, präferiert [17]. Eine weitere Studie zeigte geringere KSP-Schwankungen, wenn das linke Bein als Standbein eingesetzt wird [18].…”
Section: Einbeinstandunclassified