1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)78517-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric synthesis of (2S,3S)-3-carboxy-proline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compound 8 could be charge-tagged to 9 using ethyl bromide. Finally, the free catalyst 1 was obtained by acidic deprotection [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compound 8 could be charge-tagged to 9 using ethyl bromide. Finally, the free catalyst 1 was obtained by acidic deprotection [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4-(4-((3 S ,5 S )-5-Carboxypyrrolidin-3-yloxy)phenyl)-1-ethylpyridinium bromide (1) was prepared analogous to a known procedure [59] and obtained as beige-brown solid (96%). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CD 3 OD) δ 8.92 (d, 3 J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, H o-py ), 8.37 (d, 3 J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, H m-py ), 8.06 (d, 3 J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, H m-ph ), 7.27/7.20 (d, 3 J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, H o-ph ), 5.42 (s, 1H, CH 2 C H CH 2 ), 4.73–4.58 (m, 3H, C H 2 CH 3 and CH 2 C H N), 3.82–3.62 (m, 2H, NC H 2 CH), 2.85–2.73 (m, 1H, CHC H 2 CH), 2.71–2.63 (m, 1H, CHC H 2 CH), 1.67 (t, 3 J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH 2 C H 3 ) ppm; 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CD 3 OD) δ 171.0 ( C ═O), 160.9 ( C ph −O), 156.9 ( C p-py −C), 145.4 ( C o-py −H), 131.0 ( C m-ph -H), 128.5 ( C p-ph -C), 125.2 ( C m-py −H), 118.0 ( C o-ph −H), 77.3/76.7 (CH 2 C HCH 2 ), 59.8 (CH 2 C HN), 57.4 ( C H 2 CH 3 ), 52.7 (N C H 2 CH), 35.7 (CH C H 2 CH), 16.7 (CH 2 C H 3 ) ppm; HRESIMS ( m / z ): [M] + calcd for C 18 H 21 N 2 O 3 , 313.1547; found, 313.1563.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct alkylation of aspartic acid derivatives was first reported by Seebach in 1981, 2 and later by Baldwin and other workers. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Except for reports of stereospecific allylation, 10,11 these reactions gave mixtures of diastereoisomers. A recent study has indicated how the structural and experimental features in such reactions affect the diastereoselectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%