Asymmetric relationships in networked agricultural innovation processes

Abstract

Purpose - In innovation networks, asymmetric relationships are both considered as an opportunity and a threat for the enhancement of innovation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how much asymmetry Flemish farmers perceive in their relationships for innovation with colleagues, suppliers and buyers. Design/methodology/approach - In total, 86 farmers active in four different agricultural subsectors in Flanders were consulted, of which 38 via in-depth interviews and 48 in seven focus groups. Data were analysed using NVivo. Findings - The authors found that across subsectors, different players in innovation networks play different roles. Furthermore, the authors observed that the majority of farmers see their relationships more as a necessity for the farm to be able to function, than as an opportunity for innovation. If they collaborate for innovation, they often prefer symmetric relationships with similar companies on horizontal level. Vertical collaboration for innovation is not very popular in the sample. Practical implications - The findings suggest that farmers should take more actions to gain power in the chain and improve their skills with regards to negotiating with their suppliers or buyers. Furthermore, the authors found which characteristics of asymmetric relationships would foster the development of innovation processes. Originality/value - Empirical work studying the effects and impacts of asymmetric relationships for innovation from the SME's perspective are still limited, especially in the agricultural sector. Furthermore, this sector is of practical relevance to study because the need for networking and innovation is very real

Gaps and barriers along the North Carolina agri-food value chain

“…Second, the finding that respondents from all stages mentioned "connectedness" as a critical issue suggests a stronger awareness of upstream and downstream stakeholders and that extending support to other members of the chain can improve the collective value chain. This finding is in direct contrast to many industries, where the value chain members are much less concerned about the chain as a whole, but rather their own improvement (Mentzer et al, 2001;Lambrecht et al, 2015).…”

Governance structures in cooperative slaughterhouses: a study on the chain of differentiated beef in the state of Paraná

“…Considering that market power can be concentrated in the retail link and that this affects producers, governance structures such as cooperatives arise as a way to increase the bargaining power of the producer link, in addition to promoting the exchange of knowledge between agents (Bijman, 2009;Corte et al, 2015;Lambrecht et al, 2015;Malorgio et al, 2012).…”

Governance structure and innovation to create and remunerate value in the specialty beef chain

“…Generated innovations can change the characteristics of transactions since they can design a product/service with greater added value which can lead to greater asset specificity and dimensions which can be difficult to be evaluated and measured. Therefore, governance structures need to foster innovations (Lambrecht et al, 2015;Nain et al, 2019;Nijhoff-Savakki et al, 2012) while adequately enabling agents to distribute the value generated (Buainain & Batalha, 2007;Malorgio et al, 2012;Mancini et al, 2019).…”

“…While contractual arrangements are necessary for the remuneration of the created value, found that such arrangements, both horizontal and vertical, are sources of innovations. The promotion of innovation in horizontal arrangements occurs due to cooperation, the possibility of reducing opportunistic behavior, and the greater flow of knowledge among agents (Lambrecht et. al., 2015;Nijhoff-Savakki et al, 2012).…”