Asymmetric extractions in orthodontics

Melgaço, Camilo Aquino; Araújo, Mônica Tirre de Souza

doi:10.1590/s2176-94512012000200025

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, midline correction and improved vertical control would be more straightforward in these scenarios. In class II subdivision instances, a three-premolar extraction strategy reduces treatment time and provides better outcomes [ 13 , 14 ].…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Asymmetric Extraction Decision in Orthodontics

Baxi¹,

Bhatia²,

Tripathi³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the treatment planning process, extraction decisions are crucial. As a therapy option, the extraction of teeth should be considered in instances where there is a lack of facial harmony and stability in the occlusion. Treatment aims, the kind of malocclusion, aesthetic considerations, and growth patterns are all factors that influence asymmetric extraction. For the most part, premolar extractions are required when there is a significant midline difference or an asymmetrical connection between the teeth. Premolars, which are the first teeth to erupt and occupy the posterior position in chewing, are more vulnerable to injury than other permanent teeth. The optimal time to remove a second molar is at the moment when the connection between the molars has normalized or when a major front cross-bite can be remedied.

show abstract

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Asymmetric Extraction Decision in Orthodontics

Baxi¹,

Bhatia²,

Tripathi³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is generally recognized that orthodontic treatment will obtain a good impact on facial proportions in some way. 7 This case presented how to treat the severe crowding, deep bite, and midline shifting in class I Angle malocclusion using fixed orthodontic appliances without some extraction and interproximal reduction (IPR) only.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment in Angle Class I Malocclusion with Severe Crowding, Deep Bite, and Midline Shifting: A Case Report

2022

Acta Med Philipp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crowding is the most common dental case worldwide. This case report describes the diagnosis and management of a 20-year-old woman with severe crowding, deep bite, and midline shifting. The patient presented with the chief complaint of crowding and an unaesthetic smile. Upon examination, the patient had Angle Class I Malocclusion. The severe crowding was treated comprehensively and successfully corrected using fixed orthodontic appliances and without extraction, only interproximal reduction (IPR).

show abstract

“…Any misplacement or irregularity in this area causes most patients pursuing orthodontic treatment. 7 More important than the different types of procedure or the philosophies of treatment, the types and degree of malocclusion, the patient's age, the patient's desires, and the skill of the orthodontist are essential for the procedure outcome. 8 The incident of malocclusion commonly occurs in equal or greater rate in adults than in children or adolescents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Class I Malocclusion With Mild Crowding and Midline Shift

Triwidianto¹,

Narmada²

2020

Dentino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The main goal of orthodontic treatment is to obtain a normal relationship of the teeth with facial structures and it is generally accepted that orthodontic treatment will have effects on facial proportion. Nowadays, facial appearance has a big influence on someone's appearance. Aesthetic facial appearance will produce a proportional, harmonious, and youthful facial profile. Case: this case report aims to describe that non extraction orthodontic treatment in class I malocclusion with mild crowding and mildline shift is a treatment with considerable success. Case management: A 19 years old female came with a chief complaint of crowding in upper and lower jaw. Intraoral examination revealed bilateral Class I molar and canine relationship. Patient had crowding in upper and lower jaw, and midline shift in lower jaw. Extra oral findings included a flat profile with competent lips. Cephalometric analysis showed skeletal class I with orthognati maxilla and mandible. Patient was bonded with 0.022-inch MBT brackets orthodontic appliance without extraction. After 20 months of treatment, an ideal arch coordination was achieved, the patient felt confident and satisfied with the treatment outcome. Conclusion: Decision to extract a tooth has to be made, not only by considering the amount of crowding, but also the eventual influence of orthodontic tooth displacement on the soft tissue surface of the face. Keywords: Crowding, Midline shift, Non – extraction.

show abstract

Asymmetric extractions in orthodontics

Cited by 10 publications

References 19 publications

Asymmetric Extraction Decision in Orthodontics

Asymmetric Extraction Decision in Orthodontics

Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment in Angle Class I Malocclusion with Severe Crowding, Deep Bite, and Midline Shifting: A Case Report

Treatment of Class I Malocclusion With Mild Crowding and Midline Shift

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About