Asylrechtlicher Selbsteintritt und Flüchtlingskrise Zugleich ein Beitrag zu den Grenzen administrativer Entscheidungsspielräume im Mehrebenensystem

Wendel, Mattias

doi:10.1628/002268816x14558791150038

2016

DOI: 10.1628/002268816x14558791150038

|View full text |Cite

Asylrechtlicher Selbsteintritt und Flüchtlingskrise Zugleich ein Beitrag zu den Grenzen administrativer Entscheidungsspielräume im Mehrebenensystem

Mattias Wendel¹

Abstract: 332 Reinhard Zimmermann Kulturelle Prägung des Erbrechts? JZ 7/2016 rechts beigetragen hat, 197 ist heute jedoch nicht mehr religiös konnotiert. Das gilt für das Testament nicht weniger als für die enge Verbindung des Menschen zu seinen Nachkommen, zu seinen Eltern und zu seinem Ehegatten: alles Punkte, für die die Juristen vergangener Zeiten sich auf Bibelverse gestützt haben. 198 Diese Bibelverse sind keine Rechtsregeln. Sie sind viel zu unspezifisch, um daraus konkrete Folgerungen für die Ausgestaltung des … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2016

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

The Refugee Crisis and the Executive: On the Limits of Administrative Discretion in the Common European Asylum System

Wendel¹

2016

Ger. law j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the Dublin System was meant to create a clear and fair division of responsibilities for the examination of applications for international protection, the recent refugee crisis highlighted the extent to which normative aspirations and political realities can diverge. That said, the Dublin System does allow for a certain degree of flexibility: By exercising the discretionary right to assume responsibility under the so-called “sovereignty clause” of Article 17, paragraph 1 of the Dublin III Regulation, Member States can examine asylum applications even when they would not formally have jurisdiction for doing so according to the criteria established by the Dublin System. Germany has relied upon this right extensively during the refugee crisis. Against this backdrop, the following contribution analyzes the reasons for, and limits of, multilevel administrative discretion in the Common European Asylum System. It argues that when a Member State exercises the right to assume responsibility in a sweeping manner, i.e. in hundreds of thousands of cases, it runs the risk of overstretching the legal limits of its discretionary powers. National administrative bodies can only invoke the right to assume responsibility insofar as this does not amount to game-changing decisions by the executive or unilateral decision-making without transnational coordination – particularly when such decisions have severe transnational consequences.

show abstract

The Refugee Crisis and the Executive: On the Limits of Administrative Discretion in the Common European Asylum System

Wendel¹

2016

Ger. law j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Entwicklungen und Perspektiven des Migrationsrechts zwischen Umbruch und Kontinuität

Janda¹

2018

VERW

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Providing a comprehensive review of the recent developments in migration and refugee law proves to be an impossible undertaking – one reason being the vast diversity of this area of law, which includes asylum, work or family migration, the other being the mix of actors in the multi-level system. The events of 2015, which are more likely to be referred to as “refugee protection crises” rather than a “refugee crisis”, undoubtedly mark a turning point. They have not only revealed the shortcomings of the Common EU Asylum System, but have triggered a broad societal debate on immigration as such. The focus of the following report will be on refugee law. First, the supra-national aspects of this increasingly Europeanized area of law shall be determined. Furthermore, the recent and various changes in national law shall be analyzed, ranging from the acceleration of asylum procedures, the efforts to limit and control migration up to the establishment of socio-economic incentive structures in order to avoid “bogus” asylum procedures. Finally, the article provides an overview of the perspectives of European and national migration and refugee law.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Asylrechtlicher Selbsteintritt und Flüchtlingskrise Zugleich ein Beitrag zu den Grenzen administrativer Entscheidungsspielräume im Mehrebenensystem

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

The Refugee Crisis and the Executive: On the Limits of Administrative Discretion in the Common European Asylum System

The Refugee Crisis and the Executive: On the Limits of Administrative Discretion in the Common European Asylum System

Entwicklungen und Perspektiven des Migrationsrechts zwischen Umbruch und Kontinuität

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About