Astuteness, Trust, and Social Intelligence

Parales-Quenza, Carlos José

doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00295.x

Cited by 13 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(37 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, it is precisely the more intelligent social actors who disproportionately reap the benefits of reciprocity, by carefully endowing their trust only in those who are unlikely to betray it. This type of intelligence can thus be viewed as a benign form of Machiavellianism (Parales-Quenza, 2006), in which socially astute individuals are rewarded by exerting a high degree of control over the conditions in which they are willing to sanction trust. The counter-side to this argument, of course, is that the less socially astute are frequently betrayed in trust relations and thus progressively withdraw from potentially fruitful interactions in the future.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Fourth, our scales measure seven aspects of social presentation, the ability to appear to be a desirable social partner: someone who is friendly, helpful, caring, and trustworthy, and who is not rude, conceited, or hostile. Being trustworthy [Parales-Quenza 2006 ] and having a prosocial attitude are key components of social intelligence [Marlowe 1986 ]. Robots are perceived as more friendly if they engage in acts of social intelligence such as mimicry and praise [Kaptein et al 2011 ], and friendliness facilitates interpersonal connections [Albrecht 2004 ].…”

Section: Our Conceptualization Of Social Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the Perceived Social Intelligence of Robots

Barchard

Lapping-Carr

Westfall

et al. 2020

J. Hum.-Robot Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robotic social intelligence is increasingly important. However, measures of human social intelligence omit basic skills, and robot-specific scales do not focus on social intelligence. We combined human robot interaction concepts of beliefs, desires, and intentions with psychology concepts of behaviors, cognitions, and emotions to create 20 Perceived Social Intelligence (PSI) Scales to comprehensively measure perceptions of robots with a wide range of embodiments and behaviors. Participants rated humanoid and non-humanoid robots interacting with people in five videos. Each scale had one factor and high internal consistency, indicating each measures a coherent construct. Scales capturing perceived social information processing skills (appearing to recognize, adapt to, and predict behaviors, cognitions, and emotions) and scales capturing perceived skills for identifying people (appearing to identify humans, individuals, and groups) correlated strongly with social competence and constituted the Mind and Behavior factors. Social presentation scales (appearing friendly, caring, helpful, trustworthy, and not rude, conceited, or hostile) relate more to Social Response to Robots Scales and Godspeed Indices, form a separate factor, and predict positive feelings about robots and wanting social interaction with them. For a comprehensive measure, researchers can use all PSI 20 scales for free. Alternatively, they can select the most relevant scales for their projects. CCS Concepts: • General and reference → Empirical studies ; Measurement ; • Human-centered computing → User studies ; HCI theory, concepts and models;

show abstract

“…Similarly, studies have identified the profile of those with a tendency to become victimizers and exercise their asymmetric power over the weakest by features such as a tendency to engage in violence and dominate peers by force, uncontrollable impulsivity, poor social skills, low tolerance for frustration, an interior need to break the rules, resorting to cheating and cunning to achieve their purposes and hostile relations with others, whether they are teachers or other students [33,38,39]. The assault process shows that negative stigmas associated with the manifestations described are structured and consolidated in both victims and victimizers.…”

Section: Emotional Stabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2019

GJFSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Colombia, aggression between elementary and secondary school students has recently been the subject of research. This article aims to show the effect of bullying on students. It is hypothesized that aggression has reached a phase of chronic anomie that is dependent on the armed conflict that has contaminated the society and its educational institutions. This article's hypothetico-deductive methodology defines indicators in terms of frequency and impact on academic performance, emotional stability, organizational climate, coexistence, and training in democracy. A literature review has detected 48 research products in the form of peer-reviewed journal articles, theses, and research reports located on the Web (Scielo, Publindex and Redalyc) after searching using keywords such as matoneo, bullying, and harassment in Colombia. The conclusion is that chronic anomie should be counteracted with an all-encompassing policy including early detection, collective therapeutic treatment, and intensified training in student-life coexistence and active citizenship.

show abstract

Astuteness, Trust, and Social Intelligence

Cited by 13 publications

References 48 publications

Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies

Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies

Measuring the Perceived Social Intelligence of Robots

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About