Knowledge Management and E-Learning 2010
DOI: 10.1201/b10347-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assurance of Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, many of the features of SR can be attributed to DPR's leadership. SR contained various features that incentivized knowledge sharing and creation that can be viewed using the lens of the SECI model, including a private message system (from individual to individual), a public discussion forum to discuss topics related to the SR (from individual to group), a support section to seek help from administrators directly when an issue arose (from individual to organization), and a ‘wiki’ to receive advice about using the site (from organization to individuals) ( United States v. Ross Ulbricht , 2017). In discussions, SR members praised DPR and his ability to quickly respond to their ongoing needs and demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many of the features of SR can be attributed to DPR's leadership. SR contained various features that incentivized knowledge sharing and creation that can be viewed using the lens of the SECI model, including a private message system (from individual to individual), a public discussion forum to discuss topics related to the SR (from individual to group), a support section to seek help from administrators directly when an issue arose (from individual to organization), and a ‘wiki’ to receive advice about using the site (from organization to individuals) ( United States v. Ross Ulbricht , 2017). In discussions, SR members praised DPR and his ability to quickly respond to their ongoing needs and demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous definitions of KM have been proposed, and two major approaches for studying KM (process, value chain) have been developed. According to the process viewpoint, KM involves the acquiring, capturing, utilizing, sharing, presenting, distributing and creating knowledge (Ungaretti et al, 2011). Similarly, Roknuzzaman et al, (2009) defined that KM is a dynamic and continuous social process that involves acquisition, organization, storage and retrieval, and dissemination of knowledge resources to user group with relevant feedback to achieve organizational goals.…”
Section: Definition Of Kmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the integration of knowledge management (KM) in instructional design has become an important pedagogical element in teacher education. KM involves knowledge sharing, creation, validation, presentation, distribution, and application (Ungaretti et al, 2011). Although KM has integrated into various teacher education programs such as Biology Education (Saunders et al, 2003), Human Services Education (Adcock et al, 2006), Science Education (EL-Deghaidy et al, 2008) and several studies have investigated the effects of integrating KM into curriculum design (Kinney et al, 1998), however, the studies of KM on a teacher-training course of HOA for secondary school teacher education are limited (Author, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the functions related to managing knowledge (KM) have gained increasing significance and have become essential for effective learning in the digital age. These functions encompass skills such as acquiring and storing knowledge, applying knowledge, sharing knowledge, and forming knowledge [4,5]. Songhao et al [6] have proposed that individuals residing in a technology-driven society should possess the capability to gather, amass, distribute, and utilize knowledge through diverse educational materials [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%