2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assumption of a ‘gravity only region’ for gravity correction of passive joint moment data may be problematic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gravitational moment was modelled using a generalised sinusoid equation (Andersen et al, 2010) in the region where passive moments were lowest. Because a range of joint angles where there is zero passive force does not exist in the ankle joint (Clarke et al, 2010), the fit was constrained to bias the effect of weight. The gravitational fit was constrained using experimental measures of the relationship between joint position and torque with a 1 kg mass, similar to that of the foot (Clauser et al, 1969), located within the centre of the foot restraints.…”
Section: Passive Ankle Joint and Mg Muscle Fascicle Mechanical Propermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitational moment was modelled using a generalised sinusoid equation (Andersen et al, 2010) in the region where passive moments were lowest. Because a range of joint angles where there is zero passive force does not exist in the ankle joint (Clarke et al, 2010), the fit was constrained to bias the effect of weight. The gravitational fit was constrained using experimental measures of the relationship between joint position and torque with a 1 kg mass, similar to that of the foot (Clauser et al, 1969), located within the centre of the foot restraints.…”
Section: Passive Ankle Joint and Mg Muscle Fascicle Mechanical Propermentioning
confidence: 99%